EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF JAK LINGKO URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT ON ROUTES 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, AND 10

Evaluation of the performance of urban public transport Jak Lingko on routes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 provinces in Jakarta. DKI Jakarta is a city with all its activities that require transportation to support the movement of its people, whether in the city or people around the border with the city area. Existing public passenger transportation must have good performance or service. This research was conducted to see the performance and service level of Jak Lingko transportation in 2020. In total there are 53 routes that must be evaluated in the DKI Jakarta Province, but for this research that will be evaluated are routes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, if you have obtained the performance results of Jak Lingko public transport then based on the minimum service standard method (SPM) Decree of the Director General 2002 and the SPM of the World Bank. The results of the analysis of these 10 routes found 4 routes in 2 indicators that need to be improved again or that do not meet the SPM parameters, the routes in question are the Jak 9, Jak 4, Jak 6 and Jak 7 routes. The headway indicator which is in the middle parameter of SPM Decree of the Director General of 2002, in the travel indicator does not meet the World Bank SPM, 3 more routes namely Jak 4, Jak 6 and Jak 7 which need to be improved again are in the travel indicators for SPM SK Dirjen 2002.


INTRODUCTION
DKI Jakarta is a city with all its activities requiring transportation to support the movement of its people, both those in the city and people around the border with the city area, public passenger transportation must have good performance or service. The increasing economic activity and development in DKI Jakarta, the need for travel will increase. Transportation problems are also increasing along with the increase in population each year. The rapid population growth is the main factor for the birth of new private vehicles operating in DKI Jakarta, to suppress the increasing growth of private vehicles, the DKI Jakarta government is currently carrying out major programs related to public transport integration, both service integration, management integration and payment integration (Ok-Otrip Final Report Guidelines, 2019).
As a follow-up to the traffic problem in DKI Jakarta, the local government conducted a trial of the Ok-Otrip program which operated in January 2018 and ended in September 2018, while in the same year the Ok-Otrip program changed its name to the jak Lingko program which means system integrated public transport. The evaluation of the jak Lingko service development plan needs to be carried out to improve and improve the performance of the route network and the integration of public transport services, as well as to achieve cost efficiency in the implementation of public transportation in DKI Jakarta.
The journey of people using motorized vehicles is influenced by the higher demand and the need for an increasing number of motorized vehicles to operate. This shows that motorized vehicles are an  2655-2086Volume 9, No. 2, Desember 2020 119

Passenger data
Collecting data by surveying the Jak Lingko transportation and recording the largest number of passengers in the transportation. Based on the average value per route in Table 2, the load factor shows that the Jak Lingko route of Jak 5 (Kampar-Rorotan) has the highest average load factor of 90.0%, while the Jak 3 route (Lebak Bulus-Andara) has the lowest average load factor of 53.3%.
The Jak 5 route has a load factor with the highest average of 90.0%, it is because of the survey results of passenger data for the three busy times (morning busy, midday busy, and evening busy) this route pISSN 2302-4240 eISSN 2655-2086Volume 9, No. 2, Desember 2020 on the day. Saturday has the highest attractiveness and generation of other Jak routes. Whereas on the Jak 3 route, why does it have a load factor with the lowest average load of 53.3%, it is because of the survey results of passenger data in the three busy times (morning busy, afternoon busy, and afternoon busy) This route on Wednesday has the lowest attractiveness and generation of other Jak routes.
b. Production of service km per vehicle per day The Jak Lingko small bus service itself, the production target km / unit / day is 200 km. Based on this target and the results of the performance analysis in Table 3, of the 10 operating routes, no route can meet the production target, while the route with the highest km / unit / day production is Jak 6 (183 km), while the lowest production is Jak 10 ( 141 km).
All routes 1-10 are below the production target (200 km) because the production km per day is low on all routes so it has an impact on km / units / day, so it is necessary to increase the production km per day on all routes 1-10, so that km / units / day can meet the production target (200 km). Based on Table 4, it is known that the service that the Jak Lingko route of Jak 10 (Tanah Abang-Kota) has the highest average frequency value of 37 vehicles, while the service with the lowest average frequency is the Jak 9 route (Roxy Mas-Karet). as many as 10 vehicles. The Jak 10 route has the highest average frequency value with as many as 37 vehicles, that is because on the Jak 10 route (Tanah Abang-Kota) there is the largest textile market in Southeast Asia especially since this market has been around since 1735, and also passes through KRL stations and destinations finally to downtown Jakarta. Route 9 has the lowest average frequency value with as many as 10 vehicles, that is because maybe there is still a low number of enthusiasts on that route so the frequency value is low compared to other routes.  Based on the average value per route in Table 5, the Jak Lingko route of Jak 9 (Roxy Mas-Karet) is 12 minutes, and the lowest is on the Jak 10 (Tanah Abang-Kota) route of 3.2 minutes. The Jak 9 route has the highest Headway value, it is because the frequency value on the Jak 9 route is low, so the frequency value is closely related to the Headway value. Likewise, the Jak 10 route has the lowest Headway value, it is because the frequency value on the Jak 10 route is high and it is clarified again, if the Headway value is high then the frequency value is automatically low, and if the Headway value is low then the frequency value is automatically high. Based on Table 6, it is known that the Jak 5 route (Kampar-Rorotan) has the highest average travel time of 152 minutes and for the lowest route Jak 4 (Grogol-Tubagus Angke) with an average of 65 minutes, based on the results of a field survey on the Jak 5 route has the highest average travel time (152 minutes) because it is because the Jak 5 route has the farthest (route length), so the travel time from origin to destination takes a long time. Meanwhile, the Jak 4 route, which has the lowest average travel time (65 minutes), is because the Jak 4 route has the shortest route length, so the travel time from origin to destination does not require a long time. Based on the average value per route in Table 7, the Jak 9 (Roxy Mas-Karet) route has the highest average travel speed of 13 km / hour and for the lowest route, Jak 4 (Grogol-Tubagus Angke), Jak 6 ( Kampung Rambutan-Pondok Gede), and Jak 7 (Tanah Abang-Tawakal) with an average speed of 10 km / hour. Based on the data in Table 8, it shows that there is only 1 route out of 10 routes that has a passenger parameter value per km that is above or touches 1.08. The route in question is the Jak 1 route (Tanjung Priok-Plumpang) with 1.08 pnp / km. and 9 more routes are below 1,08.  Based on the SGO value in Table 9, it is known that Jak 5 (Kampar-Rorotan) has the highest value reaching 99%, while the lowest is on the Jak 6 route (Kampung Rambutan-Pondok Gede) with a value of 94%.

Jak Lingko service level towards SPM
The performance that can be obtained from the survey that has been carried out will be compared with the SPM of public transportation, so that it will be known whether the performance of the 10 Jak Lingko transportation is in accordance with the public transport standards by the World Bank and the Decree of the The load factor indicator from Table 10 shows the results of the analysis of the entire Jak Lingko route on the Jak 1-10 route, and can be compared with the SPM Decree of the Director General of 2002 regarding the administration of public transportation in urban areas on fixed and regular routes, for the whole of the Jak 1-10 route. 10 is in medium parameter. This means that the analysis results on the entire route are in the standard value of 70-100%.
The entire Jak 1-10 routes have all met the World Bank SPM, so the conclusion from the comparison with the SPM SK Dirjen 2002 and the World Bank SPM on the entire Jak 1-10 routes, there are no routes that are in less parameter or that produce information that does not meet. Table 11. SPM comparison Headway

No Route Description Unit Result
This means that the Jak 9 route is at a standard value of 10-15 minutes, and other routes are at a standard value of <10 minutes.
The entire Jak 1-10 routes have all met the World Bank SPM, so the conclusion is that the comparison with the SPM SK Dirjen 2002 and the World Bank SPM on the entire Jak 1-10 route, there are no routes that are in deficient parameters or that produce information that does not comply, although there are one route that is in the medium parameter (Jak 9). The travel speed indicator from Table 12 shows the results of the analysis of the entire Jak Lingko route on the Jak 1-10 route, and can be compared with the SPM SK Dirjen 2002 regarding the administration of public transportation in urban areas in fixed and regular routes, for the Jak 4, Jak 6 route. and Jak 7 are in moderate parameters, while for routes Jak 1, Jak 2, Jak 3, Jak 5, Jak 8, Jak 9, and Jak 10 are in good parameters. This means that for routes Jak 4, Jak 6 and Jak 7 are at standard values of 6-10 km / hour, and routes for Jak 1, Jak 2, Jak 3, Jak 5, Jak 8, Jak 9, and Jak 10 are in standard values> 10 km / hour.

c. Travel speed
All Jak 1-10 routes have met the World Bank SPM, except for the Jak 9 route producing slower information, because these routes experience traffic congestion resulting in delays in travel speed, so the conclusion is from a comparison with SPM SK Dirjen 2002 and SPM World Bank On the entire Jak 1-10 routes, there are no routes that are in less parameter or that produce information that does not meet (slower), although the Jak 9 route produces slower information because the results of the analysis exceed the standard value of 10-12 Km / hour. Fleet availability indicators from Table 13, the analysis results obtained from the entire Jak Lingko route on the Jak 1-10 route, and can be compared with the SPM SK Dirjen 2002 concerning the administration of public transportation in urban areas in fixed and regular routes, for the whole route is in the parameter good, this means that the results of the analysis on the entire route are at a standard value of 9-100.

d. Fleet availability
All Jak 1-10 routes have met the World Bank SPM, so the conclusion from the comparison with the SPM SK Dirjen 2002 and the World Bank SPM on the entire Jak 1-10 routes, there are no routes that are under parameters or that produce information that does not meet.

CONCLUSION
Based on the results and discussion that have been described, the following conclusions can be drawn: The performance results of Jak Lingko public transport on route 1-10 have seven indicators, namely: load factor, production of service km per vehicle per day, frequency, headway, vehicle time and speed, passenger production / service km, and fleet availability. The seven indicators produce an average value per route which can be seen which route has the largest analysis value and the smallest analysis value. The results of the Jak Lingko service level on the SPM SK Dirjen 2002 and the SPM World Bank. There are 4 indicators (load factor, headway, travel speed, fleet availability) and almost entirely there are no routes that are in deficient parameters or that produce information that does not meet, except for the travel speed indicator there is 1 (one) route, namely the Jak 9 route ( Roxy Mas-Karet) which did not meet the SPM World Bank. This is because the results of the analysis exceed the standard value of 10-12 Km / hour.

REFERENCE
Abubakar, Iskandar, dkk, 1998, City Transportation System, Directorate General of Land Transportation, 1998, City Transportation System, Directorate of City Traffic and Transportation System Development, Jakarta.