COMPRESSIVE CAPACITY OF HELICAL PILE FOUNDATION ON PEAT WITH VARIATION OF HELICAL PLATE DIAMETER

Authors

  • Sapria Adi Student of Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru
  • Ferry Fatnanta Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru
  • Syawal Satibi Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i1.5708

Keywords:

helical foundation, slab diameter, peat, bearing capacity.

Abstract

The use of helical foundations to support structures on peat soil is still a new method. Research is needed to develop this foundation. There are 6 types of helical foundation tested on peat soil. To study the effect of helical plate diameter, plate diameters were varied with sizes 25 cm (M), 35 cm (L), and 45 cm (G). Plate positions (1, 2, 3 plates) are designed at 300 mm spacing. The axial compression bearing capacity test is carried out based on the constant rate of penetration procedure. At the beginning of loading, the load increases significantly. At a certain descent, the load begins to decrease slowly. The load-settlement curve shows that the larger the plate diameter, the greater the load it can withstand. The largest bearing capacity is produced by the GGG 30 foundation (3 plates dia.45 cm), which is 10.83 kN. LLL 30 helical foundation (3 plates dia.30 cm) provides a bearing capacity of 7.14 kN. These results clearly explain that the increase in plate diameter is directly proportional to the increase in the axial compression bearing capacity.

Author Biographies

Sapria Adi, Student of Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru

Student of Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru

Ferry Fatnanta, Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru

Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru

Syawal Satibi, Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru

Civil Engineering Study Program, Riau University Pekanbaru

References

Agus Aldib Mubarok, 2014. EFISIENSI PENGGUNAAN PROFIL KOMPOSIT PADA JEMBATAN BENTANG 30 METER. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 3 (2), 52-62. (Indonesian). http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/815

ASTM D1143-81. 1994. Standard Test Method For Piles Under Static Axial Compressive Load. United States of America: Annual Book of ASTM Standards sec 4

D&B Engineering Contractors. 2004. Pratical Design And Inspection Guide For Helical Piles And Helical Tension Anchors. Colorado : International Marketing & Research, Inc

Fajar Rizki Putranto, Syaiful Syaiful, 2019. PENGARUH PENAMBAHAN GENTENG PRESS JATIWANGI DAN DAMDEX TERHADAP KUAT TEKAN BETON. Jurnal Komposit 3 (1), 15-18. (Indonesian). http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/komposit/article/view/3742

Fadhila Muhammad Libasut Taqwa, Muhammad Kholik, Syaiful Syaiful, 2017. PERHITUNGAN FAKTOR KEAMANAN DAN PEMODELAN LERENG SANITARY LANDFILL DENGAN FAKTOR KEAMANAN OPTIMUM DI KLAPANUNGGAL, BOGOR. Prosiding SENTRA (Seminar Teknologi dan Rekayasa). Issue 3. (Indonesian). http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/sentra/article/view/1427

Marwahyudi Marwahyudi, 2019. TEGANGAN GESER BATU BATA BERKONSTRUKSI PADA DINDING RUMAH RAWAN GEMPA. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 8 (2), 80-86. (Indonesian). http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/2725

Muhamad Lutfi, Ersa Bestari Mulyadi, 2021. EVALUATION OF SEKOLAH ISLAM TERPADU (SIT) ALIYA BOGOR BUILDING STRUCTURE SYSTEM BASED ON THE REQUIREMENTS OF SNI 2847:2019. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 10(1):15-26. http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/3105

Muhamad Lutfi, Ayub Maulana, 2020. ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE RELIABILITY OF UTSMAN BIN AFFAN BUILDING (Case Study : Sekolah Islam Terpadu Aliya Bogor). ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 9(2):93-106. http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/3111

Narasimha Rao. S, Prasad, Y. V. S. N, Shetty, M.D. 1991. The Behaviour of Model Screw Piles in Cohessive Soils. Soils and Foundation, vol. 31, No. 2: 35 – 50

Nila Prasetyo Artiwi, Telly Rosdiyani, 2021. IMPLEMENTATION OF FREE LEARNING POLICY-INDEPENDENT CAMPUS PROGRAMS ON MASTERING COURSE THEORY OF FOUNDATION DESIGN. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 10 (1), 173-182. http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/4419

Paikun Paikun, Cici Fatimah, Nadhya Susilo Nugroho, Dody Kusmana, 2021. LABOR PRODUCTIVITY RATING MODEL FOR LIGHT BRICK WALL INSTALLATION IN RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 10 (2), 260-270. http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/4998

Perko Howard. 2009. Helical Piles (A Pratical Guide to Design and Installation). New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Sprince Andina dan Pakrastinah Leonids. 2010. Helical Pile Behaviour And Load Transfer Mechanism In Different Soils. Journal of Riga Technical University, vol. 10, No. 10: 121 – 130.

Syaiful Syaiful. 2020. Analysis on the addition of fiber the strong bending mixed concrete. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Science. 15(6):724-729. http://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2020/jeas_0320_8152.pdf

Syaiful Syaiful. 2021. Additional Betonmix to increase the strength of concrete press. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Science. 16(15):1583-1589. http://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2021/jeas_0821_8652.pdf

Thilakasari. 2006. A Review of The Design Practices of Bored and Cast In Situ Pile In Sri Lanka. Anual Transcations of IESL, pp. 96 – 101.

Toni Hartono Bagio, Eugene Yudhistira Baggio, Sri Wiwoho Mudjanarko, Pio Ranap Tua Naibaho, 2021. REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM AND COLUMN PROGRAMMING BASED ON SNI:2847-2019 ON SMARTPHONE USING TEXAS INSTRUMENTS. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 10(2):287-300. http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/5101

Yulita Arni Priastiwi, Arif Hidayat, Rinaldo Tamrin, Difa Bagus Sendrika, 2021. RESISTANCE OF MORTAR WITH PPC CEMENT AND GEOPOLYMER MORTAR WITH WHITE SOIL SUBSTITUTION IN H2SO4 IMMERSION. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 10 (2), 213-224. http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO/article/view/4579

Published

2021-12-21

How to Cite

Adi, S., Fatnanta, F., & Satibi, S. (2021). COMPRESSIVE CAPACITY OF HELICAL PILE FOUNDATION ON PEAT WITH VARIATION OF HELICAL PLATE DIAMETER. ASTONJADRO, 11(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i1.5708

Issue

Section

Articles