Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Manajemen (Edisi Elektronik): Journal that focuses on management research, with the following scope:

  1. HR Management
  2. Marketing Management
  3. Financial Management
  4. Education Management
  5. Hospital management
  6. Sharia Management
  7. Education Management
  8. Micro Business Management
  9. Banking Management

 

Articles published in the Jurnal Manajemen (Edisi Elektronik) concern research in management science in general in all fields.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

All articles submitted to this journal will go through a review process as follows:

  1. Pre-reviewed by editors to ensure that the article meets journal requirements and is relevant to topics covered in the journal.
  2. Blindly reviewed by at least 1 (one) reviewer for comments and recommendations in order to decide whether the article will be accepted or not.
  3. The editor will decide whether to accept or reject the article and can ask the author to revise the article before making a final decision.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Manajemen (Edisi Elektronik) Published three volumes in the year,  in February, June and October.

 

Open Access Policy

Jurnal Manajemen (Edisi Elektronik) is an open-access journal, which means that all content is available free of charge at no cost to either the user or the institution. Users are permitted to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search for, or link to full-text articles in this journal without seeking prior permission from the publisher or author. This corresponds to Budapest Open Access Initiative

 

 

 

Archiving

This journal uses the LOCKSS system to create a distributed filing system among participating libraries and enables the library to create permanent archives of journals for preservation and restoration purposes.

 

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

This statement clarifies the ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewers and the publisher LPPM Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor.

This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.


Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication


The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the authors, the journal editors, the peer reviewers, the publisher and the society.  

LPPM Universitas Ibn Khaldun as the publisher of this Journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, LPPM Universitas Ibn Khaldun and Editorial Board of the journal will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The decision is based on the recommendation of the journal's editorial board members and reviewers. The journal abides by legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor confers with the editorial team and reviewers in making this decision.

Non-Discrimination

The editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts for intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor, reviewers, and editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial team, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by any of the editorial board members and reviewers in their own research.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The journal uses the double-blind review process. The reviewers advise the editor-in-chief in making the editorial decision. The editor-in-chief communicates with authors, as required, and helps them in improving the quality of their research paper.

Promptness

The journal editors are committed to providing a timely review to the authors. If a reviewer does not submit his/her report in a timely manner, the paper is immediately sent to another qualified reviewer.

Confidentiality

Manuscript content is treated with at most confidentiality. The journal uses the double-blind process. Except for the editor-in-chief, the editors and reviewers cannot discuss a paper with any other person, including the authors.

Standards of Objectivity

The editors and reviewers are required to evaluate papers based on the content. The review comment must be respectful of the authors. The reviewers are required to justify their decision and recommendation.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work wherever possible. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review. They should be prepared to provide such data within a reasonable time.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and authors are so advised.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

When a paper is submitted for possible publication, the submitting author makes a written statement that the paper has not been published not it is currently under publication with any other journal. Simultaneous submission is considered unethical and is therefore unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgement of the work of others is required. Authors must cite publications that have led to the authors’ current research.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the research reported in the manuscript. The corresponding author has a responsibility to keep co-authors posted with the review process. If accepted, all authors are required to give a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

 

 

Author Fee

This journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)

Fast-Track Review: 0.00 (IDR)

Article Publication: 800.000.00 (IDR) or 50 (USD) (Inclued Turnitin)

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover publications costs.