Type on the Sound Absorption Coefficient Chicken Feather Composite

Authors

  • Meldawati Artayani INDONESIA
  • Asniawaty Kusno INDONESIA
  • Nurul Jamala INDONESIA
  • Rosady Mulyadi INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v13i2.15112

Keywords:

matrix type; chicken feather; absorption coefficient; chemical pulping.

Abstract

the potential to be a composite reinforcement and increase sound absorption through the Chemical Pulping process. This study aims to investigate the alleged influence of the use of matrix type on the strength of sound absorption in chicken feather fiber composites. The research method used is experimental research with the manufacture of composite specimens that vary the volume fraction of composite fibers with various types of matrices. Sound absorption testing using impedance tubes. Data analysis techniques in this study use descriptive data analysis. The results of this test show the effect of using matrix type on increasing the absorption coefficient of SBA composites. The maximum absorption coefficient is found in the SBA-K composite (Chicken Feathers – Kanji).

Author Biographies

Meldawati Artayani, INDONESIA

Program Studi Arsitektur, Universitas Fajar Makassar

Asniawaty Kusno, INDONESIA

Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Hasanuddin Gowa

Nurul Jamala, INDONESIA

Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Hasanuddin Gowa

Rosady Mulyadi, INDONESIA

Jurusan Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Hasanuddin Gowa

References

Ali, M.F. et al. (2022) ‘Effects of inorganic materials on the waste chicken feather fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester resin-based composite: An approach to environmental sustainability’, Composites Part C: Open Access, 9(October), p. 100320. doi:10.1016/j.jcomc.2022.100320.

Fagbemi, O.D. and Sithole, B. (2021) ‘Evaluation of waste chicken feather protein hydrolysate as a bio-based binder for particleboard production’, Current Research in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 4(August), p. 100168. doi:10.1016/j.crgsc.2021.100168.

Farhad Ali, M. et al. (2021) ‘Utilization of waste chicken feather for the preparation of eco-friendly and sustainable composite’, Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4(June), p. 100190. doi:10.1016/j.clet.2021.100190.

Habibie, S. et al. (2021) ‘Serat Alam Sebagai Bahan Komposit Ramah Lingkungan, Suatu Kajian Pustaka’, Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Material, 2(2), pp. 1–13.

Kurniawan, O. et al. (2019) ‘Pengembangan Material Ringan Serat Gelas’, 19(3), pp. 187–194.

Saravanan, K. and Prakash, C. (2021) ‘Study of Acoustic Properties of Chicken Feather Fibre (CFF) and Its Hybrid Composites’, Journal of Natural Fibers, 18(4), pp. 502–509. doi:10.1080/15440478.2019.1629560.

Vietanti, F., Basuki, N. and Ma, S. (2022) ‘Pengaruh Jumlah Layer dan Jenis Matriks pada Serat Hibrida Sabut Kelapa / Woven terhadap Kekuatan Tarik dan Impak’, Senastitan Ii, pp. 361–366.

Wiranegara, C.B., Salahudin, X. and Hastuti, S. (2022) ‘Pemanfaatan Serat Alam Dan Serat Sintetis Sebagai’, Jurnal …, 5(2), pp. 30–37. Available at: http://www.e-journal.polmanceper.ac.id/index.php/Foundry/article/view/57.

Zou, F. et al. (2023) ‘Maximizing sound absorption, thermal insulation, and mechanical strength of anisotropic pectin cryogels’, Chemical Engineering Journal, 462(January). doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.142236.

Artawan, I. P., Chaerul, M., & Gusty, S. (2023). Characterization of Oil and Diesel Waste Modifiers in Lasbutag Asphalt Cold Mix (Aggregated Buton Asphalt Layer). ASTONJADRO, 12(3), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i3.13868

Verdian, R., & Muin, R. B. (2023). The effect of variation in the length of water hyacinth fiber twisted on split tensile strength high performance fiber concrete. ASTONJADRO, 12(2), 546–557. httpBaggio, E. Y., Bagio, T. H., & Tistogondo, J. (2023). Mix design programming for normal concrete using cubic equation. ASTONJADRO, 12(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i1.7143s://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i2.9346

Paikun, P., Amdani, S. A., Susanto, D. A., & Saepurrahman, D. (2023). Analysis of the compressive strength of concrete from brick wall waste as a concrete mixture. ASTONJADRO, 12(1), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i1.8145

Sitompul, S. T., & Pariatmono, P. (2022). Reliability of simple space truss structure. ASTONJADRO, 11(3), 600–607. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i3.7399

Romadhon, E. S., Antonius, A., & Sumirin, S. (2022). Design of Low Alkali activator Geopolymer Concrete Mixtures. ASTONJADRO, 11(3), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i3.7484

Widodo, S., Safarizki, H. A., & Marwahyudi, M. (2022). Durability of concrete based on the remaining life of the building Case study: reinforced concrete in klaten district. ASTONJADRO, 11(3), 713–720. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i3.7848

Astariani, N. K., Eka Partama, I. G. N., & Dwi, I. G. A. R. C. S. (2023). Influence Substitution of Tabas Stone Waste which Coated Polyester Resin to Concrete Compressive Strength. ASTONJADRO, 12(3), 738–745. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i3.9065

Argoanto, Y., Bagio, T. H., & Kusumastuti, D. (2023). Dissipating the earthquake lateral base force of structure using sliding plate and link beam base isolation. ASTONJADRO, 12(1), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i1.5289

Baggio, E. Y., Bagio, T. H., & Tistogondo, J. (2023). Mix design programming for normal concrete using cubic equation. ASTONJADRO, 12(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i1.7143

Bachtiar, E., Setiawan, A., & Musahir, F. (2022). HIGH STRENGTH CONCRETE USING FLY ASH A CEMENT AND FINE AGGREGATE. ASTONJADRO, 11(2), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i2.6725

Priastiwi, Y. A., Hidayat, A., Tamrin, R., & Sendrika, D. B. (2021). RESISTANCE OF MORTAR WITH PPC CEMENT AND GEOPOLYMER MORTAR WITH WHITE SOIL SUBSTITUTION IN H2SO4 IMMERSION. ASTONJADRO, 10(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v10i2.4579

Bagio, T. H., Baggio, E. Y., Mudjanarko, S. W., & Naibaho, P. R. T. (2021). REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM AND COLUMN PROGRAMMING BASED ON SNI:2847-2019 ON SMARTPHONE USING TEXAS INSTRUMENTS. ASTONJADRO, 10(2), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v10i2.5101

Gumilang, P. D., Safarisky, H. A., & Marwahyudi, M. (2021). PRESS STRONG CONCRETE ADDED SHELL OF KEONG SAWAH. ASTONJADRO, 10(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v10i1.3986

Sutarno, S., Rahmawati, D., & Masvika, H. (2021). EFFECT OF CHICKEN FEATHER WASTE ON CONCRETE MIXING ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND FLEXURAL STRENGTH. ASTONJADRO, 10(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v10i1.4330

Mubarak, M., Rulhendri, R., & Syaiful, S. (2020). PERENCANAAN PENINGKATAN PERKERASAN JALAN BETON PADA RUAS JALAN BABAKAN TENGAH KABUPATEN BOGOR. ASTONJADRO, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v9i1.2694

Marwahyudi, M. (2020). STIFFNESS DINDING BATU BATA MENINGKATKAN KEKUATAN STRUKTUR. ASTONJADRO, 9(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v9i1.2840

Published

2024-05-21

How to Cite

Artayani, M., Kusno, A., Jamala, N., & Mulyadi, R. (2024). Type on the Sound Absorption Coefficient Chicken Feather Composite. ASTONJADRO, 13(2), 477–483. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v13i2.15112

Issue

Section

Articles