The Aggregate Gradation in Road Reconstruction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v13i3.16068

Keywords:

reconstruction; characteristics; job mix design; comparison; additional.

Abstract

Reconstruction of the road section uses the flexible pavement method where aggregate material is the main component of the structure. Choosing the right aggregate gradation and meeting the specification requirements will greatly determine the quality of the road. This research aims to determine the characteristics of aggregate gradation sourced from stock files and compare the results of aggregate gradation analysis of job mix design planning consultants. The method uses laboratory testing. Aggregate wear test results 2-3 = 5.36%, 1-2 = 6.14%. The absorption value of aggregate 2-3 = 0.87%, 1-2 = 1.79%, 0.5 - 1 = 1.80% and stone ash = 2.27%. Values of dry specific gravity, SSD specific gravity, and apparent specific gravity of aggregate 2-3 = 2.73, 2.69, 2.66, 1-2 = 2.72, 2.64, 2.62 0.5- 1 = 2.70, 2.62, 2.58, rock ash = 2, 53, 2.59, 2.69. These values meet the requirements of the 2018 Bina Marga specifications, 2nd revision. The comparison of the results of the field aggregate gradation test analysis with the results of the job mix design analysis is the same because the aggregates tested come from the same stock file. The results of the sieve analysis test showed that the coarse aggregate fineness modulus of 2-3, 1-2, and 0.5 - 1 did not meet the specification standards, while the fine aggregate for stone ash did. The value that does not meet is caused by not paying attention to the additional note that the coarse aggregate retained on the 1" sieve is ±6%.

Author Biographies

Hakzah Hakzah, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare, Parepare

Andriansyah Andriansyah, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare, Parepare

Mustakim Mustakim, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare, Parepare

Jasman Jasman, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare, Parepare

References

Bina Marga. (2018). Spesifikasi Umum Bina Marga 2018 Revisi 2 (Terkendali). Direktorat Jendral Bina Marga, Departemen PU, Jakarta.

Binamarga. (2004). “Pedoman Penggunaan Tailing Untuk Lapis Pondasi dan Lapis Pondasi Bawah.

Fathurrozi, & Gorang Sesiliana, I. (2015). Pengendalian Mutu Agregat Kelas A dan Kelas B Pada Pekerjaan Jalan Sungai Ulin-Mataraman. Jurnal Poros Teknik, 7(1), 1–8.

Fathurrozi, & Sukmawan, F. (2020). Uji Kualitas Material Lapis Pondasi Agregat Kelas A pada Tumpukan Material Yang Berasal dari Bentok dan Awang Bengkal pada Pekerjaan Jalan Hercules Kecamatan Landasan Ulin.

Matulessy Nona, F., Desembardi, F., & Sukowati Gontoro, D. (2022). Uji Kualitas Agregat Kelas A Sebagai Lapis Pondasi Atas Jalan Menggunakan Material Quarry Saoka.https://doi.org/10.33506/jimats.v1i1.1838

Hakzah. (2021). Studi Kelayakan Sifat Fisik Agregat Untuk Struktur Perkerasan Jalan (Quarry Gunung Lakera Bum, Gunung Lompongang, Dan Gunung Benderae Kab. Pinrang). Jurnal Karajata Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 1 10.31850/karajata.v1i1.699

Rozy Fathur. & Fajar Sukmawan. (2022). Kualitas Lapis Pondasi Atas Kelas A Dengan Menggunakan Material Berasal Dari Kuari Bentok Dan Awang Bangkal Suatu Studi Kasus. Jurnal Gradasi Teknik Sipil. Volume 4 No 1. 10.31961/gradasi.v4i1.896

Standar Nasional Indonesia, (2008). Metode Pengujian Batas Plastis dan Indeks Plastisitas Tanah. SNI-03-1966-2008, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta.

Standar Nasional Indonesia, (2008). Metode Pengujian Batas Cair Tanah, SNI-03-1967-2008, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta.

Standar Nasional Indonesia, (2008). Metode Pengujian Keausan Agregat Mesin Abrasi Los Angeles. SNI-03-2417-2008. Departemen Pekerjaan Umum. Jakarta.

Standar Nasional Indonesia, (2015). Metode Pengujian Gumpalan Lempung dan Butiran Mudah Pecah Dalam Agregat (ASTM C142-04,IDT), SNI-03-4141-2015, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta.

Standar Nasional Indonesia, (2014). Tata Cara Pengambilan Contoh Uji Agregat (ASTM D75/D75M-09.IDT). SNI-03-6889-2014. Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta.

Standar Nasional Indonesia, (2012). Metode Pengujian Persentase Butir Pecah Pada Agregat Kasar, SNI-03-7619-2012, Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Jakarta.

Sukirman, S (2010). Perencanaan Tebal Struktur Perkerasan Lentur. Bandung: Nova.

S Syaiful, H Rusfana. (2022). Rigid Pavement Planning in Traffic: Case Study in Ciherang Road and Pemuda Road, Bogor Regency, Indonesia. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 1-13.

Syaiful, S., Siregar, H., Rustiadi, E., & Hariyadi, E. S. (2022). Performance of Three Arms Signalized Intersection at Salabenda in Bogor Regency. ASTONJADRO, 11(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i1.4955

Triyanto, T., Syaiful, S., & Rulhendri, R. (2020). EVALUASI TINGKAT KERUSAKAN JALAN PADA LAPIS PERMUKAAN RUAS JALAN TEGAR BERIMAN KABUPATEN BOGOR. ASTONJADRO, 8(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v8i2.2628

Mubarak, M., Rulhendri, R., & Syaiful, S. (2020). PERENCANAAN PENINGKATAN PERKERASAN JALAN BETON PADA RUAS JALAN BABAKAN TENGAH KABUPATEN BOGOR. ASTONJADRO, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v9i1.2694

Published

2024-09-22

How to Cite

Hakzah, H., Andriansyah, A., Mustakim, M., & Jasman, J. (2024). The Aggregate Gradation in Road Reconstruction. ASTONJADRO, 13(3), 930–940. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v13i3.16068

Issue

Section

Articles