Effect of Bolt Preload and Friction Coefficient on Slip Capacity and Yield in Steel Truss Bridge Connections

Authors

  • Ricky Nofrianto Tologana INDONESIA
  • Andreas Triwiyono INDONESIA
  • Djoko Sulistiyo INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i4.19267

Keywords:

bolt preload, friction coefficient, slip capacity, yield capacity, and steel truss bridge connection.

Abstract

This study analyzes the effect of bolt preload and friction coefficient on slip capacity and yield in steel truss bridge connections using the finite element method (FEM) through Abaqus software. Preload variations ranging from 0.2  to 0.9  and friction coefficients between 0.3 and 0.5 were applied to find the relationship between these factors. The results indicate that increasing preload and friction coefficient enhances slip capacity. Specifically, at a preload of 0.2  and friction coefficient of 0.3, slip occurred at 1549.07 kN, whereas at a preload of 0.9  and friction coefficient of 0.5, the slip capacity reached 11354.1 kN. However, excessive preload (>0.7 ) can lead to local failure due to stress concentration around the bolt hole. Validation using the AISC analytical method showed an average difference of only 1.6% with a maximum error of 5.28%, indicating a high level of accuracy in the FEM model. These findings provide recommendations for optimal connection design, suggesting a preload of 0.7  and a friction coefficient of 0.5 to enhance connection capacity while mitigating the risk of premature failure

Author Biographies

Ricky Nofrianto Tologana, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Andreas Triwiyono, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

Djoko Sulistiyo, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta

References

PT. Cigading Habeam Centre, “Keunggulan Jembatan Rangka Baja dalam Proyek Infrastruktur.” Accessed: Feb. 19, 2025. Available: https://cigading-habeam.com/artikel/keunggulan-jembatan-rangka-baja-dalam-proyek-infrastruktur

Y. F. Lyu, G. Q. Li, Y. B. Wang, H. Li, and Y. Z. Wang, “Effect of bolt pre-tension on the bearing behavior of high strength steel connections,” Eng Struct, vol. 241, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112491.

A. Nasseri and V. Heszler, “Simulation of stick-slip friction Nonlinear modelling and experimental validation,” Sweden, 2020. [Online]. Available: www.chalmers.se

A. W. Lacey, W. Chen, H. Hao, and K. Bi, “Experimental and numerical study of the slip factor for G350-steel bolted connections,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 158, pp. 576–590, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.04.012.

A. Lacey, W. Chen, H. Hao, K. Bi, and A. W. Lacey, “Shear stiffness of bolted inter-module connections for modular steel buildings,” Australia, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334862871

W. A. Thornton and L. S. Muir, “Prying Action for Slip-Critical Connections,” ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2012.

B. Zheng, J. Wang, Y. Gu, G. Shu, J. Xie, and Q. Jiang, “Experimental study on stainless steel high-strength bolted slip-resistant connections,” Eng Struct, vol. 231, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111778.

T. S. Puerto, M. Mashayekhi, M. Sanayei, and E. Santini Bell, “Multiaxial fatigue assessment of complex steel connections: A case study of a vertical-lift gussetless truss bridge,” Eng Struct, vol. 235, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111996.

PT Tosadah, “Dampak Korosi: Ancaman dan Solusi yang Harus Diketahui.” Accessed: Dec. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://tosadah.com/dampak-korosi-ancaman-dan-solusi-yang-harus-diketahui/

Torrey and Jessica D, “Optimization of Test Methods for Cathodic Protection Systems on Hydraulic Structures,” 2019. Available: https://www.usbr.gov/research/peer_review.pdf

M. D’Antimo, M. Latour, G. F. Cavallaro, J. P. Jaspart, S. Ramhormozian, and J. F. Demonceau, “Short- and long- term loss of preloading in slotted bolted connections,” J Constr Steel Res, vol. 167, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.105956.

R. Grzejda, “Finite element modeling of the contact of elements preloaded with a bolt and externally loaded with any force,” J Computation Applied Math, vol. 393, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2021.113534.

M. Mahmoudi, M. Kosari, M. Lorestani, and M. Jalili Sadr Abad, “Effect of contact surface type on the slip resistance in bolted connections,” J Construction Steel Res, vol. 166, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.105943.

P. L. Rosenstrauch, M. Sanayei, and B. R. Brenner, “Capacity analysis of gusset plate connections using the Whitmore, block shear, global section shear, and finite element methods, vol. 48, pp. 543–557, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.032.

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga, “Pedoman No: 07/BM/2005 Gambar standar rangka baja bangungan atas jembatan kelas A dan B,” 2005.

Simulia Abaqus, “Getting Started with Abaqus: Keywords Edition,” 2014.

American Institute of Steel Construction, “Companion to the AISC Steel Construction Manual Volume 1: Design Examples American Institute of Steel Construction,” 2019.

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Tologana, R. N., Triwiyono, A., & Sulistiyo, D. (2026). Effect of Bolt Preload and Friction Coefficient on Slip Capacity and Yield in Steel Truss Bridge Connections. ASTONJADRO, 14(4), 1303–1318. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i4.19267

Issue

Section

Articles