Typology and Transformation of Traditional Spatial Planning in Balinese Indigenous Villages: The Case of Blahbatuh

Authors

  • I Gusti Ngurah Anom Gunawan INDONESIA
  • Suzanna Ratih Sari INDONESIA
  • Bangun IR. Hasritanto INDONESIA
  • Sukawi Sukawi INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i4.19272

Keywords:

Ulu Teben, Balinese Traditional Village, spatial planning, cultural sustainability, land-use transformation.

Abstract

The spatial planning of traditional Balinese villages embodies a profound cultural and religious philosophy, ensuring a balance between sacred spaces, residential areas, and public domains. This study investigates the implementation of the Ulu Teben concept within the spatial structure of traditional villages in Blahbatuh, Bali, and its adaptation to modernization and economic shifts. The primary objective is to assess the extent to which Ulu Teben principles have been maintained and to identify key factors driving spatial transformations. A qualitative approach with a case study method is employed, integrating field observations, in-depth interviews with customary leaders and local communities, and document analysis. The research utilizes thematic and spatial analysis, supported by Geographic Information System (GIS)-based mapping to track spatial alterations. Findings indicate that while Ulu Teben remains a foundational principle in traditional village spatial planning, various adaptations have emerged due to population growth, economic pressures, and the expansion of the tourism sector. These changes have led to shifts in land use, including the conversion of sacred zones into residential and commercial areas. The degree of adaptation varies across different traditional villages, demonstrating flexibility in the application of traditional spatial structures. This study concludes that safeguarding traditional spatial planning necessitates a balanced strategy that integrates indigenous wisdom with modern urban planning policies. Strengthening customary regulations, leveraging digital mapping technologies, and promoting active community involvement are crucial measures in preserving the integrity of the Ulu Teben concept amid modernization challenges.

Author Biographies

I Gusti Ngurah Anom Gunawan, INDONESIA

Departemen Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Suzanna Ratih Sari, INDONESIA

Departemen Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Bangun IR. Hasritanto, INDONESIA

Departemen Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

Sukawi Sukawi , INDONESIA

Departemen Arsitektur, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang

References

Windia, W., & Dewi, N. L. P. (2013). Tri Hita Karana dan Implementasinya dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Bali. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.

Budiharjo, E. (1997). Arsitektur: Bentuk, Ruang, dan Tatanan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tjahjono, G. (2000). Cosmology and Architecture in Premodern Indonesia: Architecture, Ritual, and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dwijendra, N. K. A. (2021). Urbanization and the transformation of traditional Balinese houses. Vernacular Architecture Review, 10(2), 89–105.

Adhika, I. N. (2022). Spatial arrangement and cultural resilience in Balinese traditional villages. Journal of Urban and Regional Planning, 45(2), 189–203.

Ardika, I. W. (2020). Arkeologi Bali: Dari Masa Prasejarah hingga Kerajaan Hindu-Buddha. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Ardika, I. W. (2020). Preservation of spatial concepts in Balinese traditional architecture. Asian Journal of Environmental Design, 14(3), 321–337.

Anom, I. P. (2018). Transformation of sacred spaces in Balinese traditional settlements: Challenges and adaptations. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(5), 654–670.

Dwipayana, I. G. (2019). Adaptation of Balinese architecture to tourism development: A case study of Ubud. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 17(1), 112–128.

Kuta, I. G. P., Wijaya, K., & Rahayu, S. (2022). Spatial dynamics of Balinese traditional villages: Adaptation and transformation. International Journal of Built Environment, 29(3), 203–217.

Krier, R. (2009). Architectural Composition. New York: Rizzoli.

Nas, P. J. M. (2003). Urban Symbolism. Leiden: Brill.

Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli.

Oliver, P. (2006). Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Architecture. London: Routledge.

Soegijanto, F. X. (2018). Perkembangan Kota dan Permasalahannya. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Sutopo, H. B. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori dan Aplikasi dalam Penelitian Sosial. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Gunawan, I. G. N. A., Sari, S. R., Hasritanto, B. I., & Sukawi , S. (2026). Typology and Transformation of Traditional Spatial Planning in Balinese Indigenous Villages: The Case of Blahbatuh. ASTONJADRO, 14(4), 1327–1337. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v14i4.19272

Issue

Section

Articles