Dynamic Response of Bridge Decks to Steady State Wind Loads: A CFD Approach

Authors

  • Bambang Supriyadi INDONESIA
  • Andreas Triwiyono INDONESIA
  • Muhamad Farhan INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v15i1.19421

Keywords:

wind, bridge, vortex, resonance, displacement.

Abstract

Indonesia, as an archipelago nation located on the equator, is affected by alternating Asian and
Australian monsoon systems throughout the year. The east monsoon spans from April to September,
while the west monsoon occurs from October to March. In Samarinda, prevailing southern winds
lead to significant fluctuations in speed and direction, impacting the stability of bridge structures.
Extreme wind events pose risks to suspension bridges through aerodynamic phenomena like flutter,
galloping, and vortex shedding, which impose substantial dynamic loads on the structure.This study
focuses on analyzing the dynamic response of bridge decks under steady state wind loads. Daily
wind data collected from January 2023 to January 2024 revealed wind speeds of 3, 4, and 5 m/s,
with extreme speeds reaching 14 and 20 m/s. Steady state simulations were conducted using the
simpleFoam solver in Simscale at these speeds, along with the critical velocity of 8.764 m/s derived
from the bridge deck's cross-section. The simulation results provided valuable insights into pressure
distributions and lateral displacement on the deck.Findings indicate that lateral displacement at a
wind speed of 20 m/s reaches 1.235 m, which exceeds design limits and highlights potential
structural vulnerabilities. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of steady state CFD
simulations in assessing wind-induced effects on bridge structures and underline the importance of
mitigation strategies to ensure stability.

Author Biographies

Bambang Supriyadi, INDONESIA

Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Andreas Triwiyono, INDONESIA

Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Muhamad Farhan, INDONESIA

Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

References

[1] Y. D. Haryanto. (2024). “Effect of Monsoon Phenomenon on Sea Surface Temperatures in Indonesian Throughflow Region and Southeast Indian Ocean,” J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 914–923, 2021, doi: 10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.6.80.

[2] BMKG. (2024).“Kecepatan Angin Harian,” 2024. https://dataonline.bmkg.go.id/dataonline-home (accessed Aug. 22, 2024).

[3] A. Desai, S. Mittal, and S. Mittal. (2020). “Experimental investigation of vortex shedding past a circular cylinder in the high subcritical regime,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 32, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1063/1.5124168.

[4] A. S. Carriols. (2015). “Vortex-induced vibrations on bridges The interaction mechanism in complex sections and a new proposed semi-empirical model,” no. November, pp. 1–192, 2015.

[5] U. G. M. Tim Investigasi Runtuhnya Jembatan Kutai Kartanegara. (2011). “Investigasi Runtuhnya Jembatan Mahakam II Tenggatong Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara Propinsi Kalimantan Timur,” 2011. [Online]. Available: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/improve-customer-service-restaurant-40461.html

[6] A. N. Sitanggang and B. Piscesa. (2012). “Analisa Struktur Atas Jembatan Kutai Kartanegara Sebelum Mengalami Keruntuhan,” pp. 1–5, 2012.

[7] I. E. S. Hadjoh (2016). “Analisis Kestabilan Jembatan Gantung Dengan Variasi Rasio Bentang Terhadap Lebar Jembatan,” UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA, 2016.

[8] S. P. Mangkoesoebroto. (2012).“Keruntuhan Jembatan Gantung Kartanegara Tragedi dalam Proses Rancang Bangun Infrastruktur Sindur,” vol. 19, no. 3, p. 207, 2012.

[9] Badan Standardisasi Nasional. (2016). Pembebanan untuk jembatan. 2016.

[10] M. Zhang, T. Wu, and F. Xu. (2018). “Vortex-induced vibration of bridge decks: Describing function-based model,” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., vol. 195, no. October 2018, p. 104016, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jweia.2019.104016.

[11] I. Kusano, E. Cheynet, J. B. Jakobsen, and J. Snæbjörnsson. (2021). “Aerodynamic study of a suspension bridge deck by CFD simulations, wind tunnel tests and full-scale observations,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1201, no. 1, p. 012007, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1201/1/012007.

[12] G. Yao, Y. Chen, Y. Yang, Y. Zheng, L. Wu, and H. Du. (2023). “Research on Mechanism of Vortex-Induced Vibration Railing Effect of Double-Deck Large-Span Suspension Bridge,” 2023.

[13] BRITISH STANDARD. (2005). “Eurocode 1 : Actions on structures - Part 1-4: General actions - Wind actions, Committee for Standarization,” vol. 3, 2005.

[14] P. B. S. Publication. (2015). “PD 6688-1-4:2015,” 2015.

[15] D. J. B. M. Kementrian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2022). PEDOMAN Bidang Jalan dan Jembatan No.02/P/BM/2022, no. 02. 2022.

[16] SURAT EDARAN MENTERI PEKERJAAN UMUM. (2015). No. 08/SE/M/2015. 2015.

[17] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2020). AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 9th EditionOnline Training. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://store.transportation.org/item/collectiondetail/202?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1%0Awww.transportation.org

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Supriyadi, B., Triwiyono, A., & Farhan, M. (2026). Dynamic Response of Bridge Decks to Steady State Wind Loads: A CFD Approach . ASTONJADRO, 15(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v15i1.19421

Issue

Section

Articles