Integration of Intelligent Intermodal River and Land Transportation in Banjarmasin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v15i3.21630Keywords:
intermodal integration, intelligent transportation, technology, network, Banjarmasin.Abstract
Banjarmasin City as a river city has great potential to integrate river and land transportation modes, but the current system performance is still hampered by weak schedule synchronization, minimal transfer facilities, and the digital divide between modes. This study used a descriptive approach, using a questionnaire with 100 respondents, field observations, and interviews with stakeholders. Analysis was conducted descriptively and percentage-wise and triangulated with qualitative findings to map travel efficiency, comfort and safety, level of integration, and the implementation of intelligent transportation technology. The results showed that in terms of efficiency, 73% of respondents experienced intermodal waiting times of more than 20 minutes and only 5% less than 10 minutes, while 66% considered intermodal transfers still difficult. Comfort and safety on land transportation were relatively good, with 87% of respondents feeling comfortable and 92% feeling safe. However, river transportation lagged behind, with 58% rating comfort as low and 63% stating that standard security facilities were not yet available. Network integration remains fragmented, with only 14% of respondents rating intermodal schedules as integrated, and 81% stating that integrated ticketing was not yet available. Technology implementation was also uneven, with 89% of respondents on land transportation accessing real-time information and 84% using QRIS, while on river transportation only 9% had ever received digital schedule information and none used cashless payments. These findings indicate the need for a development strategy that includes schedule synchronization, the construction of physical connectors such as disabled-friendly gangways and pedestrian paths, the digitalization of kelotok services including real-time information and electronic payments, institutional strengthening and control centers, and education to increase literacy in the use of smart intermodal modes.
References
. Humaira, D. (2015). Potensi dan tantangan transportasi sungai di Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Logistik dan Transportasi Indonesia, 4(2), 77–88.
. Zhu, Z., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2019). River-based transportation and its integration with land transport in Southeast Asia. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 145(5), 04019014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000528
. Antaranews. (2024). Pemkot Banjarmasin bangun shelter integrasi transportasi sungai dan darat. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com
. Wu, X., Li, J., & Chen, Y. (2020). Development of smart transportation systems in urban mobility. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 9(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.07.001
. Cohen, B. (2010). Smart cities wheel: Six dimensions of a smart city. Smart City Council.
. Muliarto, H. (2011). Konsep transportasi cerdas untuk pengembangan kota berkelanjutan. Jurnal Perencanaan Kota dan Daerah, 8(1), 45–56.
. Mitta, R. (2018). Integrasi sistem transportasi berbasis intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Jurnal Transportasi Modern, 12(4), 201–210.
. Chairi, A., Pradana, A., & Rasyid, M. (2017). Evaluasi keterpaduan sistem transportasi antarmoda di kawasan perkotaan. Jurnal Rekayasa Transportasi, 9(2), 87–98.
. Efendi, R. (2018). Implementasi sistem transportasi cerdas (ITS) pada moda transportasi publik di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Teknologi Transportasi, 14(1), 55–63.
. Atikah, N. (2018). Analisis peran moda transportasi publik terhadap mobilitas perkotaan di Surabaya. Jurnal Transportasi, 20(3), 145–156.
. Müller, S., Hoffmann, P., & Braun, R. (2021). Intermodal freight transport: Concepts, benefits, and challenges. Transportation Research Procedia, 52, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.01.015
. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
. Kurniawan, A. (2017). Metodologi penelitian: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan campuran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
. Yulianti, N. (2013). Analisis integrasi layanan transportasi publik di Kota Surabaya. Jurnal Rekayasa Transportasi, 5(2), 101–110.
. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology.
. Modarelli, G., Bencardino, M., & Del Giudice, V. (2024). Smart mobility: Technological innovations and policy frameworks for sustainable urban transport. Sustainability, 16(2), 1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031154
. Rahman, A. (2020). Evaluasi integrasi moda transportasi publik Suroboyo Bus dan angkutan feeder. Jurnal Transportasi Perkotaan, 12(1), 33–42.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ASTONJADRO
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Paper submitted to ASTONJADRO is the sole property of the Astonjadro Journal. Unless the author withdraws the paper because he does not want to be published in this journal. The publication rights are in the journal Astonjadro.ASTONJADRO
LICENSE
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://ejournal.uika-bogor.ac.id/index.php/ASTONJADRO
