Material Waste Analysis in Building Structural Works Using the Lean Construction Method

Authors

  • Gea Geby Aurora Syafridon INDONESIA
  • Rezky Ariessa Dewi INDONESIA
  • Syahrizal Syahrizal INDONESIA
  • Gina Cynthia R Hasibuan INDONESIA
  • Indra Jaya INDONESIA
  • Nurul Ika Putri Dalimunthe INDONESIA
  • Ananta Thariq INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v15i3.22451

Keywords:

material waste, lean construction, construction efficiency, waste management

Abstract

The lean construction approach is a systematic framework offered to identify and minimize non-value-adding processes that cause material waste in construction projects, which contribute to inefficiencies, cost overruns, and decreased project performance. This study investigates the types and causes of material waste in the construction of a public infrastructure project by applying lean construction principles. Several challenges were observed during implementation, including frequent design modifications, specification changes, limited storage capacity, and various on-site technical issues. The research utilizes key project documents such as the S-curve, Bill of Quantities (BoQ), and As-Built Drawings to analyze material use and waste patterns. The methodological steps include identifying high-cost materials, conducting a Pareto analysis, calculating installed material volumes, performing waste level assessments, and evaluating waste-generating activities based on lean waste categories. The findings reveal that the most prominent types of waste were defect, overproduction, waiting, and inventory. Defects were primarily caused by changes in building specifications. Overproduction occurred due to insufficient optimization during planning. Waiting-related waste was a result of untimely ordering of materials, while inventory-related waste stemmed from inadequate material storage practices. The identification of high-cost materials and Pareto analysis revealed four types of materials with the highest potential for waste generation: 16 mm diameter reinforcing steel bars (D16), 8 mm diameter reinforcing steel bars (Ø8), Portland cement, and 13 mm diameter reinforcing steel bars (D13), and according to the waste level analysis, the highest waste level percentage is D13 Deformed Steel Bars with a waste volume of 1138,18 kg and a waste level of 4,035%. The study underscores the importance of proactive material management and lean-based planning to enhance project efficiency and sustainability.

Author Biographies

Gea Geby Aurora Syafridon, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

Rezky Ariessa Dewi, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

Syahrizal Syahrizal, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

Gina Cynthia R Hasibuan, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

Indra Jaya, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

Nurul Ika Putri Dalimunthe, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

Ananta Thariq, INDONESIA

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan

References

[1] Loosemore, M., & Forsythe, P. (2019). Sustainable construction technology adoption. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811749-1.00009-2

[2] Osman, T., Victor, C., Abdulmoneim, A., et al. (2016) Epidemiology of Substance Use among University Students in Sudan. Journal of Addiction, 2016, 2476164.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2476164

[3] Formoso, C., Bølviken, T., & Viana, D. (2020). Understanding waste in construction. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429203732-7

[4] Alwadhenani, A. (2020). Potential benefits from practices in construction waste material controls. https://doi.org/10.33915/ETD.7809

[5] Riveros, C. P., Ruiz, A., Mesa, H., & Guevara, J. A. (2022). Critical factors influencing early contract termination in public design–build projects in developing and emerging economies. Buildings, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12050614

[6] Soharu, A., Naveen, B. P., & Sil, A. (2022). Construction waste causes and solution - Action research. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.21.00045

[7] Tafesse, S., Girma, Y., & Dessalegn, E. (2022). Analysis of the socio-economic and environmental impacts of construction waste and management practices. Heliyon, 8(3), e09169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09169

[8] Kaliannan, S., Nagapan, S., Abdullah, A. H., Sohu, S., & Jhatial, A. A. (2018). Determining root cause of construction waste generation: A global context. Civil Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.28991/CEJ-03091179

[9] Sapuay, S. E. (2016). Construction waste – Potentials and constraints. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENV.2016.07.074

[10] Khorate, A., & Pataskar, S. V. (2014). Management and minimization of construction waste for residential site.

[11] Roosandriantini, J., Projotomo, J. (2024). Study of Kurt Dietrich’s Design Principles and Elements in Batak Karo. Jurnal Koridor. http://doi.org/10.32734/koridor.v15i1.12655

[12] Muftiadi, A., Rivani, R., & Fordian, D. (2021). Analysis on sources of inefficiency in the construction sector: High cost of infrastructure development in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620210000028004

[13] Cavalieri, M., Cristaudo, R., Ferrante, L., & Guccio, C. (2019). Does the project design matter for the performance of infraAustructure execution? An assessment for Italy. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40797-018-00082-9

[14] Ogbeifun, E., & Pretorius, J. (2022). Investigation of factors responsible for delays in the execution of adequately funded construction projects. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 14(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2022-0008

[15] Sepasgozar, S. M. E., et al. (2021). Waste management and possible directions of utilising digital technologies in the construction context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 313, 129095. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2021.129095

[16] Okonkwo, C. N., Evans, U. F., & Ekung, S. (2022). Unearthing direct and indirect material waste-related factors underpinning cost overruns in construction projects. The International Journal of Construction Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2022.2052431

[17] Kabirifar, K., Mojtahedi, M., Wang, C., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2020). Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 121265. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.121265

[18] Gharehbaghi, K., & Scott-Young, C. (2018). Waste diminution in construction projects: Environmental predicaments. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 127(1), 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/127/1/012010

[19] Mali, A. D., & Kanade, G. N. (2020). Use of lean technology for increase of productivity in construction industry. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research.

[20] Khopade, M., & Desale, S. V. (2022). Lean technology in construction. International Journal for Science Technology and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.42512

[21] Karningsih, P. D., Anggrahini, D., Karim, M. B., & Adhitama, R. (2017). Improving project efficiency using lean construction. In 2017 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture and Industrial Automation (pp. 179–183). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAMIMIA.2017.8387613

[22] Firmawan, F., Othman, F., & Yahya, K. (2012). Improving project performance and waste reduction in construction projects: A case study of a government institutional building project. International Journal of Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.14716/IJTECH.V3I2.1104

[23] Dogan, A. (2023). Qualitative methods in economic sciences. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800376199.00016

[24] Qualitative Methods. (2022). In Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods (pp. 216–230). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-818697-8.00216-8

[25] Boakye, M. K., & Adanu, S. K. (2022). On-site building construction workers perspective on environmental impacts of construction-related activities: A relative importance index (RII) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) approach. Sustainable Environment. https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2022.2141158

[26] Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation (2nd ed.). Free Press.

[27] Chen, Z.-S., et al. (2021). Sustainable building material selection: An integrated multi-criteria large group decision making framework. Applied Soft Computing, 112, 107903. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASOC.2021.107903

[28] Kamel, W., & Bassioni, H. A. (2023). Informatic analysis and review of literature on the optimum selection of sustainable materials used in construction projects. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.01.011

[29] Kar, S., & Jha, K. N. (2023). Examining the effect of material management practices on material availability and waste reduction in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-13589

[30] S., S., R., S. S., & Kamath, N. (2016). Project material management by ABC with EOQ analysis. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research.

Published

2026-09-15

How to Cite

Syafridon, G. G. A., Dewi, R. A., Syahrizal, S., Hasibuan, G. C. R., Jaya, I., Dalimunthe, N. I. P., & Thariq, A. (2026). Material Waste Analysis in Building Structural Works Using the Lean Construction Method. ASTONJADRO, 15(3), 982–989. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v15i3.22451

Issue

Section

Articles