FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY OF GREEN BUILDING INVESTMENT GRAHA CIMB NIAGA JAKARTA BUILDING WITH A LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS APPROACH

Authors

  • Hardiyanto Purnomo Civil Engineering Departement Gunadarma University, Jakarta
  • Andi Tenrisukki Tenriajeng Civil Engineering Departement Gunadarma University, Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i2.6135

Keywords:

building energy efficiency, green building, life cycle cost, LCC, NPV, AIRR.

Abstract

Global warming and climate change are undeniable global challenges. A phenomenon that cannot be underestimated. Temperature uncertainty, environmental damage, natural disasters to diseases that may arise due to global warming can be catastrophic. Green building is here to answer these challenges. Energy consumption in buildings is quite large and has an impact. The building aspect accounts for 35% and 38% of global energy use and carbon emissions, respectively. The amount of greenhouse gases is projected to reach 42.4 billion tons by 2035. The large initial cost comparison and ignorance of the benefits of green building causes investors to be reluctant to apply the Green Building concept. There is a need for an analysis of the life cycle cost (LCC) in the Green Building investment of the CIMB Niaga Graha Building so that the benefits of the Green Building concept are known. Graha CIMB Niaga is the first existing building in Indonesia to have a Green Building predicate with a Platinum level by BCAI Singapore. LCC analysis is expressed by Net Present Value of Savings (NPV), Savings Investment Ratio (SIR), Discounted Payback Period (DPP), Adjusted Internal Rate of Return (AIRR) and Sensitivity Analysis. Environmental gains are also expressed by NPV per 1 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) savings. The results showed that the investment was profitable and feasible. The profit is shown by the NPV parameter of Rp. 8,930,649,864 > 0, SIR of 2.69 > 1, DPP of 4.4 < 20, and AIRR of 43.88% greater than MARR of 11.72%. Investment is still profitable if the rate of increase in investment is below 163.44% or a decrease in electricity savings is below 61.58%. The results of the study also show that the investment is profitable and feasible in terms of environmental impact of Rp.410.039 per 1 GHG Savings.

Author Biographies

Hardiyanto Purnomo, Civil Engineering Departement Gunadarma University, Jakarta

Civil Engineering Departement Gunadarma University, Jakarta

Andi Tenrisukki Tenriajeng, Civil Engineering Departement Gunadarma University, Jakarta

Civil Engineering Departement Gunadarma University, Jakarta

References

A Marguna, NI Hayati, R Rulhendri. 2012. APLIKASI TEKNIK EARNED VALUE DALAM PENGENDALIAN BIAYA DAN WAKTU PROYEK (Studi Kasus Proyek Pembangunan Gedung SDN Beji 2 Depok). ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 1 (2), 44-56. (Indonesian).

Azeem, S. dkk. 2017, Examining barriers and measures to promote the adoption of green building practices in Pakistan, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 6 (3), pp.86–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-06-2017-0023

BCAI of Singapore, 2011, Green Mark Award 2011, Singapura.

BCAI of Singapore, 2015, Green Mark Award 2015, Singapura.

BCAI of Singapore, 2019, Green Mark Award 2019, Singapura.

Conci, M. dkk, 2019, Trade-off between the economic and environmental impact of different decarbonisation strategies for residential buildings, Building and Environment, Vol. 155 (23), pp.137–144.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.051

Darko, A. dkk., 2017, Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: The United States green building experts perspectives, Energy and Buildings. Vol. 144 (1), pp.320–332.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.03.060

Debrah, C., Chan, A. P. C., dan Darko, A., 2021, Green Finance Gap in Green Buildings: A Scoping Review and Future Research Needs, Building and Environment. Vol. 207.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108443

DR Astoeti, NKA Dwijendra. 2021. GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE BASED ON GREEN BUILDING ASSESSMENT (Case Study of Sukawati Art Market Construction Stage, Gianyar Regency). ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 11 (1), 94-107.

Dwaikat, L. N. dan Ali, K. N., 2014, Green Buildings Actual Life Cycle Cost Control: A Framework for Investigation, 13th Management in Construction Researchers' Association (MiCRA) Annual Conference and General Meeting, pp.1-13.http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1485.7921

Dwaikat, L. N. dan Ali, K. N., 2018, Green Buildings Life Cycle Cost Analysis And Life Cycle Budget Development: Practical Applications, Journal of Building Engineering. Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 18, pp. 303–311.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.015

Gaol, L. A. R. L. dan Rahmawati, F. 2013, Analisa Kelayakan Teknis dan Finansial pada Proyek Apartemen Dian Regency Surabaya, Jurnal Teknik ITS, Vol. 2 (1), pp.C59–C62. (Indonesian). .http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v2i1.3033

G Natasasmita, T Murtejo, N Chayati, M Lutfi. 2018. STUDI KELAYAKAN INVESTASI FINANSIAL (Studi Kasus: Perumahan BIA Residence). ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 7 (1), 1-7. (Indonesian).

I Sabariah, S Syaiful, NI Hayati. 2012. ANALISIS METODE NETWORK PLANNING DAN S-CURVE PROYEK KONSTRUKSI DI BOGOR. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 1 (1), 28-34. (Indonesian).

I Setiawan. 2013. ANALISIS PEMAKAIAN BIAYA PELAKSANAAN PROYEK DENGAN BEBERAPA ALTERNATIF CASH FLOW (Studi Kasus: Pada Proyek pembangunan Gedung Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia Bogor). ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 2 (1), 50-57. (Indonesian).

Kniefel, J. and Webb, D. 2020, Life Cycle Costing Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Handbook 135, Washington.

Peraturan Gubernur Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, 2012, Nomor 38 Tahun 2012, Bangunan Gedung Hijau. (Indonesian).

Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum Dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, 2015, Nomor 02/Prt/M/2015. Bangunan Gedung Hijau. (Indonesian).

Prasetya, H., H, F. S. and Sugiyarto 2017, Analisis Teknis dan Finansial Proyek Pembangunan Apartemen U-Residence 3 Karawaci Tangerang Selatan, Jurnal Matriks Teknik Sipil, Vol. 5 (3), 990–998. (Indonesian). .https://doi.org/10.20961/mateksi.v5i3.36729

PT. Grahaniaga Tatautama, 2010, Buletin Graha CIMB Niaga, Vol. 6, Jakarta. (Indonesian).

PT. Grahaniaga Tatautama, 2011, Buletin Graha CIMB Niaga, Vol. 8, Jakarta. (Indonesian).

PT. Grahaniaga Tatautama, 2011, Buletin Graha CIMB Niaga, Vol.9, Jakarta. (Indonesian).

PT. Grahaniaga Tatautama, 2011, Buletin Graha CIMB Niaga, Vol. 10, Jakarta. (Indonesian).

PT. Grahaniaga Tatautama. 2013, Buletin Graha CIMB Niaga, Vol. 16, Jakarta. (Indonesian).

PT. Grahaniaga Tatautama, 2015, Buletin Graha CIMB Niaga, Vol. 22, Jakarta. (Indonesian).

PT. Grahaniaga Tatautama. 2015, Buletin Graha CIMB Niaga, Vol. 23, Jakarta. (Indonesian).

S Syaiful, S Sutarsa. 2020. Analysis of Sustainable Financial Investment Feasibility Study on Housing Casase Cetrene. Proceeding of the 5th North American IEOM Society International Conference, Detroit, Michigan, USA. (5).3631-3639. http://www.ieomsociety.org/detroit2020/papers/716.pdf

S Anwar, NI Hayati. 2013. ANALISIS PEMAKAIAN METODE EARNED VALUE SEBAGAI ALAT PENGENDALIAN PROYEK. ASTONJADRO: CEAESJ 2 (2), 19-28. (Indonesian).

Rizki Andini dan Christiono Utomo, 2014, Analisa Pengaruh Penerapan Konsep Green Building Terhadap Keputusan Investasi pada National Hospital Surabaya, Vol.3 (2), pp.53–56. (Indonesian). http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j23373539.v3i2.6899

Published

2022-05-08

How to Cite

Purnomo, H., & Tenriajeng, A. T. (2022). FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY STUDY OF GREEN BUILDING INVESTMENT GRAHA CIMB NIAGA JAKARTA BUILDING WITH A LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS APPROACH. ASTONJADRO, 11(2), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v11i2.6135

Issue

Section

Articles