Improving Project Performance Based on Building Information Modelling 6D & LCCA in High-Rise Office Building

Authors

  • Ferdiansyah Ibnu Prastowo INDONESIA
  • Albert Eddy Husin INDONESIA
  • Nur Amalia INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i2.8787

Keywords:

building information modelling; BIM 6D; life cycle cost analysis; cost performance.

Abstract

Of the total 5.9 million existing buildings, the Office occupies the 2nd position of the most types of buildings with 16% of the Total Total. The least used aspect of BIM (Building Information Modeling) is the ability to obtain building energy models using the 6D BIM methodology. This digital information model is to simulate building energy and improve building energy systems. In this way, 6D BIM simulation allows us to make building design and operational decisions. In the case of increased energy, which leads to greater quality and comfort in the sustainable use of buildings. This issue has a special relationship in public buildings. Where energy efficiency and comfort are two fundamental criteria that are highly valued by society. Once the building's energy model is prepared, it will study and identify possible ones to improve energy efficiency, as well as analyze the incorporation of other, more efficient forms of renewable energy such as the use of natural light. From this research, "10 factors that affect cost performance in Office Building Projects" Maintenance costs, Use of Photovoltaic Solar Panel Materia, Model Obyetifiability, Office Equipment (TV, Computer, Printer etc.), Use of refrigen without ODP, Use of Elevators, Initial cost of retrofit, Materia Façade, Environmentally friendly materials.

Author Biographies

Ferdiansyah Ibnu Prastowo, INDONESIA

Master of Civil Engineering, Mercu Buana University, Jakarta

Albert Eddy Husin, INDONESIA

Master of Civil Engineering, Mercu Buana University, Jakarta

Nur Amalia, INDONESIA

Master of Civil Engineering, Mercu Buana University, Jakarta

References

T. C. Marrana, J. D. Silvestre, J. De Brito, and R. Gomes, “Lifecycle Cost Analysis of Flat Roofs of Buildings,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 143, no. 6, 2017.

A. E. Husin, M. A. Berawi, S. Dikun, T. Ilyas, and A. R. B. Berawi, “Forecasting demand on mega infrastructure projects: Increasing financial feasibility,” Int. J. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 73–83, 2015.

Kiamili, C., Hollberg, A., & Habert, G. (2020). Detailed assessment of embodied carbon of HVAC systems for a new office building based on BIM. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083372

A. Naidenov and A. Naidenov, “Using SPSS for Process Quality Control – A Critical Review Using SPSS for Process Quality Control – A Critical Review,” no. February 2014, 2015.

T. Subramani and S. R. Rajiv, “Productivity Of Industry Using SPSS,” vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 239–250, 2016.

Dewi, D. A. N. N. (2018). Modul Uji Validitas Dan Hormonal. Universits Diponegoro, October.

Bon-Gang, H. (2018). Cost Premium, Performance and Improvement of Green Construction Projects. Performance and Improvement of Green Construction Projects, 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815483-0.00008-9

Arayici, Y. (2015). Building information modeling. In Building Information Modeling.Attia, S., Beltrán, L., De Herde, A., & Hensen, J. (2009). “Architect friendly”: A comparison of ten different building performance simulation tools. IBPSA 2009 - International Building Performance Simulation Association 2009, 204–211.

Pahnael, J. R. N., Soekiman, A., & Wimala, M. (2020). Penerapan Kebijakan Insentif Green Building Di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Infrastruktur, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.35814/infrastruktur.v6i1.1315

Sahlol, D. G., Elbeltagi, E., Elzoughiby, M., & Abd Elrahman, M. (2021). Sustainable building materials assessment and selection using system dynamics. Journal of Building Engineering, 35, 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101978

Environmental Performance Index (EPI), 2020. Dipetik pada Januari 2021, dari https://epi.yale.edu

Jungsik, C., Hansaem, K., & Inhan, K. (2015). Open BIM-based quantity take-off system for schematic estimation of building frame in early design stage. Journal of Computational Design and Engineering,2,16–25.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcde.2014.11.002

GBCI, (2020) EDGE Indonesia Dipetik pada Januari 2021, dari GBCI:http:/www.gbcindonesia.org/edge/edge-indonesia

Husin, A. E., Setyawan, T. L., Meidiyanto, H., Kussumardianadewi, B. D., & Eddy Husin, M. K. (2019). Key success factors implementing BIM based quantity take-off in fit-out office work using relative importance index. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 8(6), 986–990. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.F82650.88619

Kustiani, I., Widyawati, R., & Warena, R. D. (2020). Seminar Nasional Ilmu Teknik dan Aplikasi Industri Analisis Pengelolaan Limbah Konstruksi dengan Skema Stepwise Incentive System dalam Rangka Penerapan Lean Construction pada Proyek Konstruksi di Lingkungan Universitas Lampung. 3.

Konstantinidou, C. A., Lang, W., Papadopoulos, A. M., & Santamouris, M. (2019). Life cycle and life cycle cost implications of integrated phase change materials in office buildings. International Journal of Energy Research, 43(1), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4238

Francisco Javier Montiel-Santiago., Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez., Julio Terrados-Cepeda. (2020) Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: BIM 6D. Study of the BIM Methodology Applied to Hospital Buildings. Value of Interior Lighting and Daylight in Energy Simulation.

Published

2023-04-24

How to Cite

Prastowo, F. I., Husin, A. E., & Amalia, N. (2023). Improving Project Performance Based on Building Information Modelling 6D & LCCA in High-Rise Office Building. ASTONJADRO, 12(2), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.32832/astonjadro.v12i2.8787

Issue

Section

Articles