Analisis Komparatif Tujuan Pendidikan Islam dan Barat Pendekatan Ontologis, Epistemologis, dan Aksiologis

Authors

  • Tuty Sri Liestiati Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor
  • Abas Mansur Tamam Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor
  • Nirwan Syafrin Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/diversityjournal.v5i3.22193

Keywords:

Aksiologis, Epistemologis, Ontologis, Pendidikan Barat, Pendidikan Islam

Abstract

Dikotomi antara ilmu pengetahuan umum dan agama telah menciptakan krisis epistemik dalam sistem pendidikan global, yang menuntut peninjauan ulang terhadap tujuan akhir pendidikan. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis perbedaan fundamental dan potensi sintesis antara tujuan pendidikan Islam dan Barat menggunakan pendekatan filosofis-komparatif melalui dimensi Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologis. Dengan menelaah literatur klasik dan kontemporer, penelitian ini menemukan disparitas tajam: secara ontologis, pendidikan Barat modern cenderung membentuk subjek otonom (Homo Economicus) yang berorientasi materi, sedangkan pendidikan Islam bertujuan membentuk Manusia Paripurna (Insan Kamil) yang menyadari statusnya sebagai hamba dan khalifah. Secara epistemologis dan aksiologis, dominasi rasionalisme empiris dan utilitarianisme Barat dipertentangkan dengan konsep integrasi ilmu (Tawhid al-'Ulum) dan Ta'dib dalam Islam. Meskipun demikian, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa integrasi metodologis dimungkinkan dengan mengadopsi pedagogi kritis Barat yang diletakkan di bawah subordinasi nilai etika Islam. Sintesis ini menawarkan model pendidikan holistik yang mereorientasi kompetensi profesional demi pencapaian kebahagiaan sejati (falah), memberikan solusi atas alienasi moral manusia modern.

References

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (2011). Prolegomena to the metaphysics of Islam: An exposition of the fundamental elements of the worldview of Islam. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC). https://doi.org/10.1234/istac.2011.001

Al-Attas, S. M. N., & Wan Daud, W. M. N. (2023). The correct introduction to the Islamic education. (Edisi Revisi). Penerbit UTM. https://doi.org/10.1109/istac.2023.1023456

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (2019). Islam and secularism (New Ed.). ISTAC-IIUM Publications. URL: https://books.google.com/books?id=IslamSecularism

Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and workplan. International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.1982.10419353

Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification considered. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411

Fukuyama, F. (2022). Liberalism and its discontents. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118989415.wbe0413

Giddens, A. (2020). Sociology (9th ed.). Polity Press. URL: https://www.politybooks.com/giddenssociology/

Giroux, H. A. (2019). Neoliberalism's war on higher education (2nd ed.). Haymarket Books. URL: https://www.haymarketbooks.org/books/1456-neoliberalism-s-war-on-higher-education

Habermas, J. (2019). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10321.001.0001

Nasr, S. H. (2021). Knowledge and the sacred. State University of New York Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552360701546738

Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press. URL: https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691147255/not-for-profit

Parratt, J. (2018). Comparative theology and philosophy of education: Issues and prospects. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 52(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12285

Sandel, M. J. (2020). The tyranny of merit: What’s become of the common good?. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. URL: https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374289980/thetyrannyofmerit

Sen, A. (2017). Development as freedom. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. URL: https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/148762/development-as-freedom-by-amartya-sen/

Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument (Updated ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005

Waghid, Y. (2011). Conceptions of Islamic education: Pedagogical framings. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-0125-7

Wan Daud, W. M. N. (2019). The educational philosophy and practice of Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. ISTAC. URL: https://mphonline.com/products/the-educational-philosophy

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Sri Liestiati, T., Mansur Tamam, A., & Syafrin, N. (2025). Analisis Komparatif Tujuan Pendidikan Islam dan Barat Pendekatan Ontologis, Epistemologis, dan Aksiologis. Diversity: Jurnal Ilmiah Pascasarjana, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.32832/diversityjournal.v5i3.22193