Acceptance and Use of LiVE Unpad in Vocational Education Student: Extended UTAUT-3 Approach

Authors

  • Muhammad Ainul Fahmi Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Farhatun Nisa Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Rani Sukmadewi Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Zidny Ilma Hasan Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/tek.pend.v12i2.13269

Keywords:

LiVE Unpad, Extended UTAUT-3, Vocational Education

Abstract

The applied Learning Management System (LMS) method utilizes a blended learning model that combines synchronous and asynchronous methods. LiVE Unpad itself is an LMS used by Padjadjaran University which was developed to apply E-learning where lecturers and students carry out the teaching and learning process separately from distance, time, or both. Owing to the important role of students as end users of the LiVE Unpad, it is important to understand the factors affecting acceptance and use of LiVE Unpad. Therefore, this study is an effort to explore the acceptance and use of LiVE Unpad among vocational school students enrolled in Universitas Padjadjaran using UTAUT-3 approach. The result in this study shows that Perceived Pedagogical Value effects all endogenous variables. All variable in UTAUT-3 influenced the behavioural intention and use behaviour except the price value and personal innovativeness factors

References

Ain, N. U., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

Brooks, C., Erickson, G., Greer, J., & Gutwin, C. (2014). Modelling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Computers and Education, 75, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.002

Buana, A., & Linarti, U. (2021). Measurement of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Using E-Learning in Higher Education. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Pendidikan, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.24036/tip.v14i2

Dijkstra, T. K., & Henseler, J. (2015). CONSISTENT PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES PATH MODELING 1. http://www.misq.org

Farooq, M. S., Jaafar, N., Ayupp, K., Salam, M., Mughal, Y. H., Azam, F., & Sajid, A. (2016). IMPACT OF ENTREPRENEURIAL SKILLS AND FAMILY OCCUPATION ON ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTIONS. In Special issue Sci.Int.(Lahore) (Vol. 28, Issue 3).

Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., Jaafar, N., Fayolle, A., Ayupp, K., Radovic-Markovic, M., & Sajid, A. (2017). Acceptance and use of lecture capture system (LCS) in executive business studies: Extending UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(4), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-06-2016-0015

Hair, J. F. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equations modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE.

Hair Jr, J. F. , H. G. T. M. , R. C. M. , & S. M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.

Hara Permana, R., Maryani, E., & Rizal, E. (2022). PENGARUH SELF-EFFICACY PADA PENGGUNAAN MEDIA LiVE UNPAD TERHADAP MINAT BELAJAR DI MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. 9(1).

Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382

Ketterl, M., Mertens, R., Wiesen, C., & Vornberger, O. (2011). Enabling user to user interactions in web lectures with history-aware user awareness. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 8(4), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/17415651111189469

Kwong, K., & Wong, K. (n.d.). Mastering Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS in 38 Hours. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332031150

Li, N., Purwanto, E., Zhang, X., Cao, F., Wong, K. H., & Chen, X. (2022). Understanding the perceived pedagogical value of JazzQuiz in interactive hybrid learning among university students: a technology acceptance analysis. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2129393

M. Adri, T. S. and I. D. (2017). PENGEMBANGAN MODEL BLENDED LEARNING BERBASIS LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DI MTS. MUHAMMADIYAH SANINGBAKAR SOLOK. JTIP, Vol. 10, No. 3, Pp. 107-116, Oct. 2017.

Nair, P. K., Ali, F., & Leong, L. C. (2015). Factors affecting acceptance & use of ReWIND: Validating the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 12(3), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2015-0001

Ramayah, T. , Y. J. A. , A. N. H. , H. H. A. , & R. S. A. (2017). Testing a confirmatory model of Facebook usage in SmartPLS using consistent PLS. International Journal of Business and Innovation, 3(2), 1-14.

S Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.

S. Luckyardi and L. Rahman. (2021). Application of E-Learning System in The World of Education. JTIP, Vol. 14, No. 1, Pp. 47 - 52, May 2021.

Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Qureshi, M. A. (2019). Acceptance of learning management system in university students: an integrating framework of modified UTAUT2 and TTF theories. In Int. J. Technology Enhanced Learning (Vol. 11, Issue 2).

Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Wamba, S. F., & Dwivedi, R. (2021). The extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2): A systematic literature review and theory evaluation. International Journal of Information Management, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102269

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008

Tosuntaş, B., Karadaʇ, E., & Orhan, S. (2015). The factors affecting acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard within the scope of FATIH project: A structural equation model based on the Unified Theory of acceptance and use of technology. Computers and Education, 81, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.009

van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008). The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China. Computers and Education, 50(3), 838–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001

Vashty, S. Q. , P. R. H. , S. J. R. , & A. H. S. (2022). PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN MEDIA LMS LIVE UNPAD TERHADAP PENERIMAAN PEMBELAJARAN DARING PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. JURNAL TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI & KOMUNIKASI DALAM PENDIDIKAN, 9(1), 26-34.

Venkatesh, V., Smith, R. H., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., & Walton, S. M. (n.d.). Quarterly USER ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: TOWARD A UNIFIED VIEW1.

Venkatesh, V., Walton, S. M., & Thong, J. Y. L. (n.d.). Quarterly Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1. http://about.jstor.org/terms

Zwain, A. A. A. (2019). Technological innovativeness and information quality as neoteric predictors of users' acceptance of learning management system: An expansion of UTAUT2. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-09-2018-0065

Downloads

Published

2023-07-31

How to Cite

Fahmi, M. A., Nisa, F., Sukmadewi, R., & Hasan, Z. I. (2023). Acceptance and Use of LiVE Unpad in Vocational Education Student: Extended UTAUT-3 Approach. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 12(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.32832/tek.pend.v12i2.13269