PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN DI PT. TUNAS BARU LAMPUNG (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 96/PID.B/2022/PN.GNS)

Universitas Bandar Lampung

Authors

  • Zulfi Diane Zaini Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • Yulia Hesti Universitas Bandar Lampung
  • Bayu Chandra Wijaya Universitas Bandar Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v10i2.14335

Abstract

Among several criminal acts related to assets and objects, there is a crime known as embezzlement where abuse of trust dominates as the main element in the occurrence of this crime. The problem in this study is what are the factors that cause the perpetrator to commit the crime of embezzlement in his position at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns, What is the criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of embezzlement in positions at PT. Tunas Baru Lampung based on Decision Number 96/Pid.B/2022/PN.Gns. The factor that caused the defendant to commit embezzlement was due to economic factors where the defendant wanted to control the goods and then sell them and the money from the sale would be divided into three and the defendant would use the money for daily needs. The defendant is responsible for his actions based on Article 374 of the Criminal Code. In conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) 1st of the Criminal Code, the defendant was sentenced to nine months in prison.

Keywords: criminal liability, embezzlement, in office

References

A. Buku

Abintoro Prakoso, 2013, Kriminologi dan Hukum Pidana, Laksbang Grafika, Yogyakarta

Anang Priyanto, 2012, Kriminologi, Penerbit Ombak, Yogyakarta

Andi Hamzah. 1993. Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, Jakarta, Pradnya Paramita

Dewi Kurnia Sari. 2020. Perlindungan Hak Asasi Tersangka Dalam Penyidikan Kepolisian Di Polres Banjar, Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB

Ende Hasbi Nassarudin, 2016, Kriminologi, CV. Pustaka Setia, Bandung

Hj. Tien S. Hulukati dan Gialdah Tapiansari B. 2006. Hukum Pidana Jilid 1, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan, Bandung

Mahfud Junaedi. 2017. Paradigma Baru Filsafat Pendidikan Islam, Depok, Kencana

Muladi dan Dwidja Priyanto. 1991. Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, Penerbit Sekolah Hukum, Bandung

P.A.F. Lamintang. 1997. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, hlm. 2-3

Rosa Agustina. 2003. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Jakarta, Pasca Sarjana FH Universitas Indonesia

Van Hammel. 2003. Rangkaian Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana 1, Reflika Aditama, Bandung

Yesmil Anwar. 2010. Kriminologi, Rafika Aditama, Bandung

B. Jurnal

Mahendri Massie. 2017. Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Menggunakan Jabatan Berdasarkan Pasal 415 KUHP, Jurnal lex crimen, Vol.6,No. 7

Rendi H Pratama, Sri Sulastri, dan Rudi Saprudin Darwis. 2015. Perlindungan Terhadap Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum, Prosiding Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Vol. 2, No. I

Tessalonika Novela Pangaila. 2016. Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Umum. Lex Privatum, Vol. 4 No. 3

Zulfi Diane Zaini. 2012. Perspektif Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pembangunan Ekonomi di Indonesia (Sebuah Pendekatan Filsafat), Jurnal Hukum, Vol. XXVIII, No. 2

Downloads

Published

2023-06-02

How to Cite

Zulfi Diane Zaini, Yulia Hesti, & Bayu Chandra Wijaya. (2023). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN DI PT. TUNAS BARU LAMPUNG (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 96/PID.B/2022/PN.GNS): Universitas Bandar Lampung. YUSTISI, 10(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v10i2.14335

Issue

Section

Artikel