Pengaruh Intensitas, Durasi, Dan Efektivitas Membaca Buku Cetak Terhadap Kemampuan Analisis Mahasiswa Dengan Mediasi Hambatan Belajar Di Pascasarjana Telkom University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/diversityjournal.v5i2.19930Kata Kunci:
analytical skills, printed book reading, learning effectiveness, learning barriers, postgraduate studentsAbstrak
The analytical ability of postgraduate students to comprehend, evaluate, and logically express academic ideas remains a challenge amid the low culture of printed book literacy. This study aims to examine the influence of reading intensity, duration, and effectiveness on students’ analytical skills, with learning barriers as a mediating variable. A quantitative approach was employed, involving 275 postgraduate students from Telkom University. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using multiple linear regression and the Baron & Kenny mediation model. The results show that learning effectiveness is the strongest predictor of analytical skills (β = 0.2062, p < 0.001), followed by reading duration (β = 0.1396, p = 0.003), while reading intensity was not significant. Learning barriers were found to partially mediate the relationship between duration and effectiveness with analytical skills (β = -0.1016, p = 0.036). The study highlights the importance of reflective learning strategies, time management, and psychosocial interventions to address learning barriers. In conclusion, analytical competence is shaped not merely by the quantity of learning but more significantly by the quality of engagement and students’ affective readiness in navigating academic processes.
Referensi
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Balai Besar Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan Provinsi Jawa Timur. (2023). Negara maju kembali ke teks cetak dan biasakan siswa tulis tangan. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://bbpmpjatim.kemdikbud.go.id/jelita/negara-maju-kembali-ke-teks-cetak-dan-biasakan-siswa-tulis-tangan/
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. Open University Press.
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723–733.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., Salmerón, L., & Ibáñez-Alfonso, J. A. (2018). Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension. Educational Research Review, 25, 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Furenes, M. I., Kucirkova, N., & Bus, A. G. (2021). A comparison of children’s reading on paper versus screen: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(3), 604–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12339
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & VonSecker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.331
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Kompas.com. (2023, September 13). Negara maju kembali ke teks cetak dan biasakan siswa tulis tangan. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/09/13/083000465/negara-maju-kembali-ke-teks-cetak-dan-biasakan-siswa-tulis-tangan
Kompasiana. (2024, Juni 11). Kembali ke buku catatan: Mengapa menulis tangan lebih berdampak bagi otak? https://www.kompasiana.com/dhe_icha/675b8f66ed64152815341df2/kembali-ke-buku-catatan-mengapa-menulis-tangan-lebih-berdampak-bagi-otak
Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2017). Relating self-regulation, motivation, and writing competence: A path analysis of students’ writing development. Educational Psychology, 37(6), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1202904
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004543
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Putwain, D., & Daly, A. L. (2013). Test anxiety prevalence and gender differences in a sample of English secondary school students. Educational Studies, 39(5), 554–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2012.659345
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
