About the Journal

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Hearty : Jurnal kesehatan masyarakat adalah jurnal ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Ilmu kesehatan Univ. Ibn Khaldun Bogor dengan skup sebagai berikut:

  • Epidemiologi
  • Kesehatan Ibu dan Anak
  • Gizi Masyarakat
  • Promosi Kesehatan
  • Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan
  • Kesehatan Keselamatan Kerja
  • Kesehatan Lingkungan
  • Biostatistik

 

Peer Review Process

 

Kebijakan review oleh Hearty: Jurnal kesehatan masyarakat sebagai berikut:

  • Setiap makalah yang disampaikan akan ditinjau oleh dua reviewer.
  • Proses peninjauan menggunakan Double-blind Review, yang mana reviewer tidak tahu identitas penulis, dan sebaliknya penulis tidak tahu identitas reviewer.
  • Dalam proses peninjauan, reviewer mempertimbangkan korespondensi judul, abstrak, diskusi (temuan) dan kesimpulan. Selain itu, reviewer juga mempertimbangkan kebaruan, dampak ilmiah, dan referensi yang digunakan dalam makalah.

Tanggapan dari mitra bestari akan menjadi pertimbangan bagi Editor untuk memutuskan:

  • Terima kiriman
  • Diperlukan revisi
  • Kirim ulang untuk ditinjau
  • Kirim ulang ke tempat lain
  • Tolak pengiriman

 

Sebuah artikel ditolak untuk publikasi karena berbagai pertimbangan, termasuk:

  • Artikel tidak sesuai dengan ruang lingkup jurnal.
  • Artikel tidak mengikuti kaidah penulisan ilmiah atau petunjuk penulisan.
  • Kesalahan metodologis mendasar.
  • Penulis menolak melakukan perbaikan atas saran yang diberikan oleh mitra bestari tanpa dasar logis.
  • Ada indikasi plagiarisme lebih dari 30%.

Publication Frequency

HEARTY terbit 4 kali dalam setahun, yaitu pada bulan Maret, Juni, September, dan Desember.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Plagiarism Check

Naskah yang masuk ke editor Hearty : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat dianjukan discreening menggunakan turnitin.com

Reference Management

Naskah yang masuk ke editor Hearty : Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat dianjurkan menggunakan reference management mendeley.com

Open Acces Policy

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative.

 

BUDAPEST OPEN ACCESS INITIATIVE

An old tradition and a new technology have converged to make possible an unprecedented public good. The old tradition is the willingness of scientists and scholars to publish the fruits of their research in scholarly journals without payment, for the sake of inquiry and knowledge. The new technology is the internet. The public good they make possible is the world-wide electronic distribution of the peer-reviewed journal literature and completely free and unrestricted access to it by all scientists, scholars, teachers, students, and other curious minds. Removing access barriers to this literature will accelerate research, enrich education, share the learning of the rich with the poor and the poor with the rich, make this literature as useful as it can be, and lay the foundation for uniting humanity in a common intellectual conversation and quest for knowledge.

For various reasons, this kind of free and unrestricted online availability, which we will call open access, has so far been limited to small portions of the journal literature. But even in these limited collections, many different initiatives have shown that open access is economically feasible, that it gives readers extraordinary power to find and make use of relevant literature, and that it gives authors and their works vast and measurable new visibility, readership, and impact. To secure these benefits for all, we call on all interested institutions and individuals to help open up access to the rest of this literature and remove the barriers, especially the price barriers, that stand in the way. The more who join the effort to advance this cause, the sooner we will all enjoy the benefits of open access.

The literature that should be freely accessible online is that which scholars give to the world without expectation of payment. Primarily, this category encompasses their peer-reviewed journal articles, but it also includes any unreviewed preprints that they might wish to put online for comment or to alert colleagues to important research findings. There are many degrees and kinds of wider and easier access to this literature. By "open access" to this literature, we mean its free availability on the public internet, permitting any users to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. The only constraint on reproduction and distribution, and the only role for copyright in this domain, should be to give authors control over the integrity of their work and the right to be properly acknowledged and cited.

While  the peer-reviewed journal literature should be accessible online without cost to readers, it is not costless to produce. However, experiments show that the overall costs of providing open access to this literature are far lower than the costs of traditional forms of dissemination. With such an opportunity to save money and expand the scope of dissemination at the same time, there is today a strong incentive for professional associations, universities, libraries, foundations, and others to embrace open access as a means of advancing their missions. Achieving open access will require new cost recovery models and financing mechanisms, but the significantly lower overall cost of dissemination is a reason to be confident that the goal is attainable and not merely preferable or utopian.

To achieve open access to scholarly journal literature, we recommend two complementary strategies. 

I.  Self-Archiving: First, scholars need the tools and assistance to deposit their refereed journal articles in open electronic archives, a practice commonly called, self-archiving. When these archives conform to standards created by the Open Archives Initiative, then search engines and other tools can treat the separate archives as one. Users then need not know which archives exist or where they are located in order to find and make use of their contents.

II. Open-access Journals: Second, scholars need the means to launch a new generation of journals committed to open access, and to help existing journals that elect to make the transition to open access. Because journal articles should be disseminated as widely as possible, these new journals will no longer invoke copyright to restrict access to and use of the material they publish. Instead they will use copyright and other tools to ensure permanent open access to all the articles they publish. Because price is a barrier to access, these new journals will not charge subscription or access fees, and will turn to other methods for covering their expenses. There are many alternative sources of funds for this purpose, including the foundations and governments that fund research, the universities and laboratories that employ researchers, endowments set up by discipline or institution, friends of the cause of open access, profits from the sale of add-ons to the basic texts, funds freed up by the demise or cancellation of journals charging traditional subscription or access fees, or even contributions from the researchers themselves. There is no need to favor one of these solutions over the others for all disciplines or nations, and no need to stop looking for other, creative alternatives.


Open access to peer-reviewed journal literature is the goal. Self-archiving (I.) and a new generation of open-access journals (II.) are the ways to attain this goal. They are not only direct and effective means to this end, they are within the reach of scholars themselves, immediately, and need not wait on changes brought about by markets or legislation. While we endorse the two strategies just outlined, we also encourage experimentation with further ways to make the transition from the present methods of dissemination to open access. Flexibility, experimentation, and adaptation to local circumstances are the best ways to assure that progress in diverse settings will be rapid, secure, and long-lived.

The Open Society Institute, the foundation network founded by philanthropist George Soros, is committed to providing initial help and funding to realize this goal. It will use its resources and influence to extend and promote institutional self-archiving, to launch new open-access journals, and to help an open-access journal system become economically self-sustaining. While the Open Society Institute's commitment and resources are substantial, this initiative is very much in need of other organizations to lend their effort and resources.

We invite governments, universities, libraries, journal editors, publishers, foundations, learned societies, professional associations, and individual scholars who share our vision to join us in the task of removing the barriers to open access and building a future in which research and education in every part of the world are that much more free to flourish.

February 14, 2002
Budapest, Hungary

Leslie Chan: Bioline International
Darius Cuplinskas: Director, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Michael Eisen: Public Library of Science
Fred Friend: Director Scholarly Communication, University College London
Yana Genova: Next Page Foundation
Jean-Claude Guédon: University of Montreal
Melissa Hagemann: Program Officer, Information Program, Open Society Institute
Stevan Harnad: Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Southampton, Universite du Quebec a Montreal
Rick Johnson: Director, Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC)
Rima Kupryte: Open Society Institute
Manfredi La Manna: Electronic Society for Social Scientists 
István Rév: Open Society Institute, Open Society Archives
Monika Segbert: eIFL Project consultant 
Sidnei de Souza: Informatics Director at CRIA, Bioline International
Peter Suber: Professor of Philosophy, Earlham College & The Free Online Scholarship Newsletter
Jan Velterop: Publisher, BioMed Central

Publication Ethics

Perlu disepakati standar etika umum yang diharapkan untuk semua pihak yang terlibat dalam proses penerbitan: penulis, editor jurnal, reviewer dan penerbit.

Adil. Seorang editor harus senantiasa mengevaluasi naskah penulis dari sisi konten keilmuwan tanpa kecenderungan yang bersifat SARA, afiliasi atau pandangan politik dari penulis.

Kerahasiaan. Editor dan setiap staf editorial tidak diperkenankan mengungkapkan informasi apapun dari naskah yang dikirimkan kepada orang lain selain penulis, reviewer, dewan editorial, dan penerbit lainnya dengan azas kewajaran.

Publikasi dan Konflik kepentingan. Materi yang tidak dipublikasikan yang tercantum dalam naskah tidak boleh digunakan untuk penelitian editor sendiri tanpa persetujuan tertulis dari penulis. Ide atau Informasi istimewa yang diperoleh melalui review harus dijaga kerahasiaannya dan tidak digunakan untuk keuntungan pribadi. Reviewer tidak boleh meninjau naskah di mana mereka memiliki konflik kepentingan akibat hubungan kompetitif, kolaboratif, ataupun hubungan lain dengan penulis, perusahaan, atau pihak institusi mana pun yang terkait dengan artikel.

Kecepatan. Setiap reviewer yang merasa tidak kompeten untuk meninjau naskah atau merasa tidak dapat meninjau naskah dalam waktu yang ditentukan harus menginfokan alasannya dan mengundurkan diri dari proses review

Kerahasiaan. Naskah yang diterima harus diperlakukan secara rahasia. Naskah tidak boleh ditunjukkan atau didiskusikan dengan orang lain kecuali yang diberi wewenang oleh editor.

Standar Objektivitas. Ulasan harus dilakukan secara obyektif dan tidak mengkritik personal penulis. Reviewer harus mengekspresikan pandangan mereka dengan jelas disertai dengan argumen pendukung.

Pernyataan Sumber. Peninjau harus mengidentifikasi karya publikasi yang relevan yang belum disitasi penulis. Setiap pernyataan yang berupa hasil pengamatan, atau argumen yang pernah dipublikasikan sebelumnya harus disertai dengan kutipan yang relevan. Reviewer juga wajib memberi peringatan editor atas naskah yang terindikasi plagiasi.

Standar Pelaporan. Setiap Penulis dari hasil laporan penelitian harus menyajikan laporan yang akurat tentang pekerjaan yang dilakukan serta diskusi yang obyektif mengenai signifikansinya. Data yang mendasari harus diwakili secara akurat di naskah. Naskah harus berisi detail dan rujukan yang cukup untuk mengizinkan orang lain meniru pekerjaan. Pernyataan palsu atau tidak akurat merupakan perilaku yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima.

Akses dan Penyimpanan Data. Penulis diminta memberikan data mentah sehubungan dengan makalah untuk tinjauan editorial, dan harus siap memberikan akses publik terhadap data tersebut (sesuai dengan Pernyataan ALPSP-STM tentang Data dan Database), jika dapat dilakukan, dan dalam kondisi apapun mampu untuk menyimpan data tersebut untuk waktu yang wajar setelah publikasi.