Studi Perbandingan Daya Dukung Aksial Tiang Pancang Tunggal Persegi Berdasarkan Hasil Uji Pembebanan Statik (SLT) dan Uji PDA pada Pembangunan Apartemen Loftville City Kota Tangerang Selatan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v7i2.9176

Keywords:

axial bearing capacity, piles, interpretation of Static Loading Test (SLT), PDA (Pile Driving Analyzer) test, BCR (bearing Capacity Ratio)

Abstract

Abstract: The deep foundation is one of the most important elements in the construction of high-rise buildings because the weight of the building will be fully borne by the foundation. This study aims to provide an overview of the prediction of the axial bearing capacity of single piles through a mathematical approach based on the results of the tests performed. The design axial bearing capacity is estimated through analysis of soil investigation results (N-SPT test results, DCPT test results, and laboratory investigation results), while the actual axial bearing capacity is obtained through interpretation of the Static Loading Test (SLT) results using the Davisson, Chin, and Mazurkiewicz, and the results of the PDA (Pile Driving Analyzer) load test were analyzed using the CAP-WAP application. The analysis was carried out on single piles with dimensions of 40x40 cm2, located in the Loftville City Apartment development project, South Tangerang City. Based on the results of the analysis that has been carried out, the planned axial bearing capacity is 131.3 tons, while the average carrying capacity based on the results of SLT interpretation on three tested piles using the Davisson, Mazurkiewicz, and Chin methods are 161.7; 205.4; and 98.8 tonnes. The results of the analysis are compared to the results of the PDA test, which shows a bearing capacity value of 290.1 tons, so the BCR values are 65.70% and 45.26% respectively. The BCR value is based on the results of the interpretation of the SLT test successively -respectively by 55.73%, 70.78%, and 34.06%. The BCR value which is not close to 100% may occur due to an error in determining the planned carrying capacity of 131 tons which is far below the actual carrying capacity value based on the PDA test results. The design carrying capacity value is then corrected to 100 tonnes and used as the 100% design load in the static load test so that the interpretation results also show BCR results that are not very accurate.

References

Das, B. M. (2007). Principles of Foundation Engineering (7th, SI ed.). Cengage Learning.

Elkasabgy, M., & El Naggar, M. H. (2015). Axial Compressive Response of Large-Capacity Helical and Driven Steel Piles in Cohesive Soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 52(2), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0331

Ginting, S. V. N. B., Irwan, I., & Nurmaidah, N. (2019). Analisa Perhitungan Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang Overpass Sei Semayang Sta. 0+350 pada Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Tol Medan-Binjai. Journal of Civil Engineering, Building and Transportation, 3(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.31289/jcebt.v3i1.2460

Harasid, H., Roesyanto, R., Iskandar, R., & Silalahi, S. A. (2018). An Analysis of the Static Load Test on Single Square Pile of 40x40 cm2, Using Finite Element Method in Rusunawa Project, Jatinegara, Jakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 126(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012044

Lim, A. (2014). Evaluasi Formula Penentuan Daya Dukung Aksial Tiang Pancang Tunggal Menggunakan Data CPT Berdasarkan Metode Langsung (Direct Method). Research Report - Engineering Science, 2. https://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/rekayasa/article/view/1095

Mishra, A., Sawant, V. A., & Deshmukh, V. B. (2019). Prediction of Pile Capacity of Socketed Piles Using Different Approaches. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37(6), 5219–5230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-00976-0

Momeni, E., Maizir, H., Gofar, N., & Nazir, R. (2013). Comparative study on prediction of axial bearing capacity of driven piles in granular materials. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 61(3), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v61.1777

Pemerintah Kota Tangerang Selatan. (2011). Peraturan Daerah Kota Tangerang Selatan No. 15 tahun 2011 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Tangerang Selatan. Pemerintah Kota Tangerang Selatan.

Prama, H., Purwana, Y. M., & Djarwanti, N. (2015). Perbandingan Analisis Kapasitas Dukung Tiang Tunggal Pondasi Minipile Menggunakan Rumus Dinamik, Hasil Uji SPT dengan Hasil Uji PDA. Matriks Teknik Sipil, 3(2), 570. https://doi.org/10.20961/mateksi.V3I2.37215

Pratama, G., Kawanda, A., & Wijaya, H. (2019). Studi Perubahan Daya Dukung Tiang Pancang terhadap Waktu Berdasarkan Uji Pembebanan Statik dan Dinamik. Jurnal Mitra Teknik Sipil, 2(4), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmts.v2i4.6169

Putra, H., & Hidayat, C. (2014). Perbandingan Nilai Daya Dukung Ultimit Tiang Tunggal Berdasarkan Hasil Pengujian Beban Dinamik dan Statik. Jurnal Jalan-Jembatan, 31(3), 162–173.

Rahman, A. A., Hariati, F., Chayati, N., & Taqwa, F. M. L. (2020). Korelasi Hasil Analisis Daya Dukung Ultimit Tiang Bor dengan Hasil Pengujian PDA (Studi kasus: Pembangunan Jalan Tol Bogor Ring Road Seksi IIIA Simpang Yasmin - Simpang Salabenda). Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 4(2), 43–49. https://dx.doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v4i2.3468

Ramadhan, M. N. D., Solin, D. P., & Astawa, M. D. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Variasi Bentuk dan Variasi Dimensi Terhadap Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang pada Gedung Kuliah Bersama dan Laboratorium FEB UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur. Paduraksa: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Warmadewa, 11(2), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.22225/pd.11.2.5628.245-252

Setiawan, B. (2013). Kebijakan Pengembangan Permukiman Vertikal di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 13(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.21009/jimd.v13i1.9098

Silitonga, A. P., & Iskandar, R. (2017). Perbandingan Daya Dukung Pondasi Tiang Pancang Metode Analitis dan Loading Test Terhadap Metode Elemen Hingga Menggunakan Model Mohr-Coulomb dan Soft Soil Pada Bore-Hole I (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Rusunawa Jatinegara Barat Jakarta Timur). Jurnal Teknik Sipil USU, 6(1). https://jurnal.usu.ac.id/index.php/jts/article/view/19433

Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., & Mesri, G. (2009). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Warouw, P. J. N., Rangkang, J., & Saerang, E. J. (2022). Analisis Daya Dukung Pondasi Bored Pile Jembatan Kalasey dengan Tes PDA pada Jalan Manado Outer Ringroad III STA 9+799. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Produk Terapan Unggulan Vokasi Politeknik Negeri Manado, 296–306. https://jurnal.polimdo.ac.id/index.php/semnas/article/view/394

Wibisono, K. M., Budiman, R. D., & Budi, G. S. (2019). Korelasi antara Uji Tarik Pondasi Tiang dengan Uji PDA. Jurnal Dimensi Pratama Teknik Sipil, 8(2), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641197909379805

Yuliawan, E., & Rahayu, T. (2018). Analisis Daya Dukung dan Penurunan Pondasi Tiang Berdasarkan Pengujian SPT dan Cyclic Load Test. Jurnal Konstruksia, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24853/jk.9.2.1-13

Published

2023-08-01

How to Cite

Taqwa, F. M. L., Muktadir, R., Hariati, F., Lutfi, M., & Apriliyandi, A. (2023). Studi Perbandingan Daya Dukung Aksial Tiang Pancang Tunggal Persegi Berdasarkan Hasil Uji Pembebanan Statik (SLT) dan Uji PDA pada Pembangunan Apartemen Loftville City Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 7(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v7i2.9176

Issue

Section

Articles