Manajemen peningkatan mutu pada SMA Negeri 2 Sumatera Barat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/itjmie.v7i3.23583Keywords:
Manajemen Pendidikan, Peningkatan Mutu, Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Trilogi SMA, Supervisi PendidikanAbstract
This study aims to describe and analyze the management practices implemented to improve educational quality at SMA Negeri 2 Sumatera Barat. The research employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected from December 2025 to January 2026 through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation involving the principal, vice principals, teachers, and other stakeholders. Data were analyzed through data reduction, presentation, conclusion drawing, and verification, while trustworthiness was ensured through source and method triangulation.The findings reveal that educational quality improvement is managed systematically, strategically, and sustainably. School resources are effectively organized through a clear distribution of roles and responsibilities. Quality enhancement is supported by effective academic learning, character development through the Trilogi S-M-A (School–Mosque–Dormitory), the integration of digital technology in educational processes, and continuous professional development for teachers. In addition, ongoing supervision and evaluation are conducted through academic and non-academic monitoring using a humanistic coaching approach. The study concludes that the integration of management functions and participatory leadership of the principal play a significant role in achieving sustainable educational quality improvement.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan menganalisis praktik-praktik manajemen yang diterapkan untuk meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di SMA Negeri 2 Sumatera Barat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan pada periode Desember 2025 hingga Januari 2026 melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dan dokumentasi yang melibatkan kepala sekolah, wakil kepala sekolah, guru, serta pemangku kepentingan lainnya. Data dianalisis melalui reduksi data, penyajian, penarikan kesimpulan, dan verifikasi, sementara keandalan data dijamin melalui triangulasi sumber dan metode. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa peningkatan kualitas pendidikan dikelola secara sistematis, strategis, dan berkelanjutan. Sumber daya sekolah diorganisasikan secara efektif melalui pembagian peran dan tanggung jawab yang jelas. Peningkatan kualitas didukung oleh pembelajaran akademik yang efektif, pengembangan karakter melalui Trilogi S-M-A (Sekolah–Masjid–Asrama), integrasi teknologi digital dalam proses pendidikan, serta pengembangan profesional berkelanjutan bagi guru. Selain itu, pengawasan dan evaluasi berkelanjutan dilakukan melalui pemantauan akademik dan non-akademik dengan menggunakan pendekatan pembinaan humanistik. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa integrasi fungsi manajemen dan kepemimpinan partisipatif kepala sekolah memainkan peran penting dalam mencapai peningkatan kualitas pendidikan yang berkelanjutan.
References
Asmoro, D. R., & Dewi, N. K. (2023). Kepemimpinan distributif dan tata kelola sekolah berbasis mutu: Studi pada SMA unggulan di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 18(2), 145–162.
Berger, R. (2023). Researcher positionality: Critical lens for qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Research, 23(4), 891–908.
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2021). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 31(5), 890–899.
Bowen, G. A. (2020). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(2), 112–124.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2021). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Etikan, I. (2021). Purposive sampling versus random sampling: Clarifying misconceptions in qualitative research. Journal of Research Methodology, 8(2), 45–58.
Fauzi, A., & Lestari, D. (2021). Positive deviance in educational management: Learning from high-performing schools in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 87, 102489. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102489
Finlay, L. (2022). Reflexivity in qualitative research: Navigating the researcher-participant relationship. Qualitative Health Research, 32(7), 1021–1033.
Hidayat, R., & Saputra, Y. (2022). Karakteristik sekolah bermutu abad ke-21: Integrasi teknologi, karakter, dan kolaborasi komunitas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 28(3), 311–329.
Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2020). Research ethics for social scientists (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2021). Pedoman implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dan penjaminan mutu pendidikan. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemendikbudristek.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2021). Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2021). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (6th ed., pp. 1–24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mulyana, E., & Indriani, R. (2024). Manajemen berbasis sekolah dan keberlanjutan mutu: Analisis empiris pada SMA berasrama. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 31(1), 78–95. doi:10.17509/jap.v31i1.56789
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2021). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20(1), 1–13.
Patton, M. Q. (2022). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Prasetyo, B. (2024). Model penjaminan mutu sekolah unggul: Studi kasus pada satuan pendidikan berasrama di Sumatra. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(1), 55–72. doi:10.29210/jppi.v9i1.3456
Prasetyo, H., & Haryanto, A. (2023). Pendidikan karakter dan manajemen mutu terpadu dalam kerangka Profil Pelajar Pancasila. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, 12(2), 189–204. doi:10.21009/jmkp.v12i2.189204
Rahmawati, D., & Pratama, R. Y. (2023). Perencanaan berbasis data dan pengambilan keputusan sekolah untuk peningkatan mutu berkelanjutan. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7(1), 45–62. doi:10.1234/jelm.v7i1.1023
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2021). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 55(2), 389–405.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suryani, L., Wijaya, A. P., & Fitriani, N. (2024). Evaluasi akreditasi berbasis kinerja: Pergeseran paradigma dari administratif ke substantif. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 201–218. doi:10.15408/jep.v15i2.3012
Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Deskasari, Suswati Hendriani, Elda Herlina
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
