Analisa Perbandingan Biaya dan Waktu Pekerjaan Bekisting Alumunium dan Bekisting Konvensional pada Proyek Hotel Morrissey Extension Jakarta

Authors

  • Andri Arthono Institut Sains dan Teknologi Al Kamal
  • M. Yayat Solihat Institut Sains dan Teknologi Al-Kamal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v10i2.22882

Keywords:

Morrissey Extension Project, cost, time, Conventional Formwork, alumunium framework

Abstract

In the execution of a construction project, the larger the project, the greater the problems that the construction services company will face. Therefore, construction service companies must have careful consideration in planning and executing a construction project. Construction service entrepreneurs always strive to realize their projects so that cost and time efficiency is achieved while still meeting quality standards. Innovations in the types and methods of formwork work continue to develop, which affect the cost, quality, and time of the work. One of the developing formwork methods that has begun to be widely used in Indonesia is aluminum formwork. Aluminum formwork, made of aluminum material with several stages in the fabrication process, has advantages compared to conventional and semi-system formwork, namely it does not produce waste material because it can be reused, does not require a lot of manpower, and requires less time to work due to the easy installation of formwork. From the cost calculations carried out on the construction of Columns, Beams, and Floor Slabs for the Morrissey Hotel Jakarta project, aluminum formwork is more expensive compared to conventional formwork, with conventional formwork costing Rp. 10,430,676,691.29 and aluminum formwork costing Rp. 11,532,891,670.00, with a cost difference of Rp. 1,102,214,978.7, making conventional formwork cheaper compared to aluminum formwork. It can be concluded that the use of conventional formwork materials is cheaper than aluminum formwork. Meanwhile, the working time for conventional formwork is 129 days, and for aluminum formwork, it is 68 days. From the calculation results of the duration of conventional and aluminum formwork work, there is a difference of 61 days, with aluminum formwork having a faster working time.

Keywords: Morrissey Extension Project, Cost and Time of Implementation, Conventional Formwork, Aluminum Formwork

References

Arisyi, L., Dewita, H., & Sembiring, K. (2024). Analisis Struktur Beton Pelat Lantai dan Balok dengan Metode Bekisting Sistem Fix Shoring. Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik Sipil,, 8(2), 399-410. doi: https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v8i2.15598

Azmarningrum , E. C., Azhar, M., & Bangun, S. (2024). Analisis Struktur Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Bekisting Pelat Baja pada Kolom Kotak dan Kolom Bulat (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Cibinong City Mall 2). Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 8(1), 105-110. doi: https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v8i1.14890

Bahri, M., & Sembiring, K. (2023). Analisis Kinerja Waktu Menggunakan Metode Earned Value Pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Kejaksaan Tinggi DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Teknika, 107-116. doi: https://doi.org/10.30736/jt.v15i2.1086

Firdausiah, N., Lestari, A. D., & Riskijah, S. S. (2025). Analisis Aluminium Formwork pada Proyek Apartemen X Surabaya. Jurnal Online Skripsi Manajemen Rekayasa Konstruksi (JOS-MRK), 6(1), 330-336. doi: https://doi.org/10.33795/jos-mrk.v6i1.6067

Ilham, M., & Herzanita, A. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Bekisting Aluminium Ditinjau dari Aspek Biaya dan Waktu Pelaksanaan. Jurnal Artesis, 1(1), 23-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.35814/artesis.v1i1.2704

Lubis, A. P., Alvindra, A., & Sihombing, L. B. (2023). Metode Pelaksanaan dan Analisa Efisiensi Pekerjaan Aluminium Formwork System pada Proyek Apartemen Sudimara Forestwalk Tower Albizia. Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 7(1), 71-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v7i1.9402

Mafriyal, M., Natalia, M., Alexander, H., Febriansyah, & Putra, A. A. (2022). Analisa Biaya dan Waktu Penggunaan Aluma System dan Scaffolding Proyek Arandra Residence Jakarta. Siklus: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 8(1), 86-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.31849/siklus.v8i1.9560

Maulana, B. F., Abadiyah, S., & Safitri, R. A. (2024). Analisa Perbandingan Bekisting Semi Sistem (Knockdown) dengan Bekisting Konvensional Berdasarkan RAB. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan, 147-156. doi: https://doi.org/10.17509/jptb.v4i2.80552

Ningrum, M. S., & Dani, H. (2024). Perbandingan Biaya Bekisting Konvensional dan Bekisting Aluminium (Studi Kasus: Gedung Rusunawa Pakal, Surabaya). Jurnal Vokasi Teknik Sipil, 2(3), 7-11. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/viteks/article/view/64227

PT. Nusa Raya Cipta, tbk. (2024). Dokumen Proyek. Jakarta: PT Nusa Raya Cipta.

Putra, M. R., Safitri, F. A., & Rifqi, M. G. (2024). Perbandingan Waktu Pekerjaan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Bekisting SIstem pada Pekerjaan Kolom Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Rumah Sakit Gresik Sehati. Jurnal Riset Teknik Sipil dan Sains, 3(1), 29-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.57203/j-riteks.v3i1.2024.29-35

Rahadianto, D., Perwitasari, D., & Mashur, A. R. (2022). Analisa Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Aluminium, Bekisting Konvensional, Semi Konvensional dan Sistem (Peri). Journal of Civil Engineering and Vocational Education, 9(2), 109-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.24036/cived.v9i2.113909

Rosatti, R., Safitri, R. A., & Nabilah, S. A. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan Penggunaan Bekisting Konvensional dan Bekisting Alumunium terhadap Biaya dan Waktu (Studi Kasus: Proyek Akasa Apartment Tower Kamaya, Bumi Serpong Damai, Tangerang Selatan). Structure, 4(2), 43-53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/civil.v4i2.8062

Samiono, R., & Salsabilla, Z. (2023). Analisis Perbandingan Bekisting Konvensional dan Bekisting Aluminium terhadap Biaya dan Waktu pada Proyek Anwa Residence Apartment. C-Line: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 13(1), 57-67. Retrieved from https://journal.istn.ac.id/index.php/cline/article/view/2091

Saptatiansah, D. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan antara Pekerjaan Pemasangan Bekisting Konvensional Dengan Bekisting Aluminium Ditinjau dari Segi Biaya dan Waktu pada Kolom. Retrieved from Dspace UII: https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/36816

Sirait, G. E., Welan, P. C., & Tanee, Y. A. (2023). Perbandingan Penggunaan Sistem Bekisting Konvensional dan Alumunium pada Proyek Pembangunan Mall X. Crane: Civil Engineering Research Journal, 4(1), 49-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.34010/crane.v4i1.9894

Wijaya, M. M., Zhafira, E., Prayogi, G. R., Dwiyana, P. A., Ribowo, A. B., Khanza, A. K., . . . Gunawan, R. (2024). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya dan Waktu Penggunaan Bekisting Konvensional dan Bekisting Aluminium Formwork. Statika: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 10(2), 1-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.53494/jts.v10i2.706

Zakariyyah, M. M., & Prafitasiwi, A. G. (2024). Analisa Perbandingan Pemasangan Bekisting Konvensional dengan Bekisting Alumunium pada Pekerjaan Struktur Gedung Sekolah. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 9-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.30587/jtsl.v1i1.7407

Downloads

Published

2026-08-04

How to Cite

Arthono, A., & Solihat, M. Y. (2026). Analisa Perbandingan Biaya dan Waktu Pekerjaan Bekisting Alumunium dan Bekisting Konvensional pada Proyek Hotel Morrissey Extension Jakarta. Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 10(2), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v10i2.22882

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Teknik Sipil

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms (Penulis yang mengajukan publikasi artikel telah menyetujui hal berikut):

  1. Through this publication, the author agree to submit the copyright of article writing to Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Teknik Sipil. This copyright submission takes the form of, but is not limited to: reproduction of the article and parts therein, including photographic reproductions; distribution of articles through printed and electronic documents; and translation of articles(Bahwa melalui publikasi ini, hak cipta penulisan artikel diserahkan kepada Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Teknik Sipil. Penyerahan hak cipta ini berupa, namun tidak terbatas pada: perbanyakan artikel dan bagian di dalamnya, termasuk reproduksi fotografi; penyebarluasan artikel melalui dokumen cetak dan elektronik; serta penterjemahan artikel).
  2. The authors agree to the terms of the Copyright Notice, according to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License., which will apply to this article if and when it is published by Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Teknik Sipil. (Para penulis setuju dengan ketentuan Pemberitahuan Hak Cipta, sesuai dengan Lisensi Internasional Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0., yang akan berlaku untuk artikel ini jika dan ketika diterbitkan oleh Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Teknik Sipil).

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.