Factors Affecting Auditor Performance and Competence : A Systematic Literature Review
Kata Kunci:
auditor, Auditor Performance, Auditor Competence, Audit Quality, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstrak
A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted to explore the relationship between auditor performance, competency, and audit quality. Of the 86 articles reviewed, the PRISMA flowchart was used to select those relevant and related to the research objectives. Twenty-seven articles discussed auditor performance, auditor capability, and audit quality. Despite extensive research on each of these aspects, gaps remain in understanding how they interact and impact overall audit practice. Factors impacting auditor performance are divided into three categories: internal factors, organizational factors, and environmental factors. Education and training, experience and exposure, and professional development are various factors that impact auditor capability. This performance and competency directly and indirectly impact audit quality. These findings are expected to offer valuable insights for audit practitioners, regulators, and academics, contributing to the improvement of audit practice and strengthening public trust in the audit profession. The importance of a holistic approach to auditor professional development, taking into account workload, competency development, and various other factors, is a key focus. Furthermore, time management and personal emotions also significantly impact auditor performance and capabilities, ultimately affecting audit quality.
Keywords:Auditor; Auditor Performance; Auditor Competence; Audit Quality; Systematic Literature Review
Referensi
Alkhalaileh, R., Alshurafat, H., Ananzeh, H., & Al Amosh, H. (2024). The impact of external auditors with forensic accounting competencies on auditee firm performance. Heliyon, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32099
Alqudah, H., Mansour, A. Z., Rawashdeh, B. S., Lutfi, A., Al Barrak, T., Almaiah, M. A., & Alrawad, M. (2024). Enhancing the internal auditors’ effectiveness in jordanian companies: The impact of cloud-based accounting usage and the moderating role of digital proficiency. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100442
Baatwah, S. R., & Al-Ansi, A. A. (2022). Dataset for understanding the effort and performance of external auditors during the COVID-19 crisis: A remote audit analysis. Data in Brief, 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108119
Beau, P., & Jerman, L. (2022). Bonding forged in “auditing hell”: The emotional qualities of Big Four auditors. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102356
Beau, P., & Jerman, L. (2024). Working apart: Remote working and social bonding in the Big Four audit firms. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2024.102727
Chen, Y., Sealy, C. L., Swanquist, Q. T., & Whited, R. L. (2024). Audit partner facial traits, gender, and career outcomes. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2023.101513
Christensen, B. E., Newton, N. J., & Wilkins, M. S. (2021). How do team workloads and team staffing affect the audit? Archival evidence from U.S. audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101225
DeFond, M., Li, Z., Wong, T. J., & Wu, K. (2024). Competence vs. Independence: Auditors’ connections with members of their clients’ business community. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2024.101702
DeZoort, F. T., & Pollard, T. J. (2023). An evaluation of root cause analysis use by internal auditors. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107081
Hanlon, M., & Shroff, N. (2022). Insights into auditor public oversight boards: Whether, how, and why they “work.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 74(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101497
Herda, D. N., & Lavelle, J. J. (2022). How and why auditors’ social exchange relationships influence their attitudes and behaviors: Implications for audit quality. In Business Horizons (Vol. 65, Issue 3, pp. 245–249). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.044
Hou, F., Shen, H., Wang, P., & Xiong, H. (2023). Signing auditors’ cultural background and debt financing costs. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102617
Hurley, P. J. (2019). Ego depletion and auditors’ JDM quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.03.001
Jérôme, T., Poretti, C., & Schatt, A. (2024). Female lead auditors, audit fees, and audit quality. The British Accounting Review, 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101497
Johansson-Berg, T., Johed, G., & Carrington, T. (2024). On the role and effects of supervisor feedback sign in auditing: Evidence from a cohort of early career auditors. British Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2024.101371
Li, M., Yang, X., & Zhai, K. (2024). Signing auditors’ experience gap and audit quality. International Review of Economics and Finance, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103484
Li, S., Liu, F., Ye, F., & Yu, M. D. (2023). Why bigger is not stronger? A perspective on auditor groups and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 42(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107099
Li, X., Dong, L., Kot, H. W., & Liu, M. (2024). Regulatory investigations, media coverage, and audit opinions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2024.100596
Liao, F. nan, Zhang, C., Zhang, J. jin, Yan, X., & Chen, T. xiang. (2024). Hyperbole or reality? The effect of auditors’ AI education on audit report timeliness. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103050
Malhotra, P. (2024). The rise of passive investing: a systematic literature review applying PRISMA framework. In Journal of Capital Markets Studies (Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 95–125). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-12-2023-0046
Maroun, W., & Duboisée de Ricquebourg, A. (2024). How auditors identify and report key audit matters - An organizational routines perspective. British Accounting Review, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2023.101263
Morris, L., & Hoitash, R. (2023). Auditor health and audit outcomes before COVID-19. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107074
Samagaio, A., & Felício, T. (2022). The influence of the auditor’s personality in audit quality. Journal of Business Research, 141, 794–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.082
Singh, H., Sultana, N., Islam, A., & Singh, A. (2022). Busy auditors, financial reporting timeliness and quality. British Accounting Review, 54(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101080
Tong, L., Wu, B., & Zhang, M. (2022). Do auditors’ early-life socioeconomic opportunities improve audit quality? Evidence from China. British Accounting Review, 54(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2021.101040
Vitali, S., & Giuliani, M. (2024). Emerging digital technologies and auditing firms: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2024.100676
Wang, X., Ferreira, F. A. F., & Chang, C. Ter. (2022). Multi-objective competency-based approach to project scheduling and staff assignment: Case study of an internal audit project. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101182
Xing, C., Li, X., & Meng, H. (2024). Influence of enterprise innovation on auditor behavior. Finance Research Letters, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105808
