Organizational Culture, Work Discipline, and Compensation on Organizational Commitment (Case study : the Department of Agriculture in the city of Bogor)

Authors

  • Anizar .
  • Masyhudzulhak Djamil
  • Anwar Rahim

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v8i1.734

Keywords:

organization, culture, compensation, discipline, work

Abstract

The results show the influence of cultural variables There are organizations, labor discipline, and compensation together (combined) to the organization's commitment to the Bogor Agricultural Department. The magnitude of effect was 69.8%. While the rest is 100% - 69.8% = 30.2% is a variable influenced the other is not examined in this study. These results indicate that when the variables of organizational culture, work discipline, and compensation together (combined) to increase the commitment of the organization will increase, and vice versa if the variables of organizational culture, work discipline, and compensation together (combined) decreased the commitment the organization will decline.
Variables influence organizational culture, work discipline, and partial compensation (their own) to the organization's commitment to the Bogor Agricultural Department, is as follows: (a) The influence of organizational culture on organizational commitment 33.1%, (b ) The influence of labor discipline on organizational commitment 37.1%, (c) The amount of the compensation effect on organizational commitment 31.8%, (d) effect of partial indicates that the variable of work discipline is the most dominant variable affecting organizational commitment. Path equation is: Y = 0.331 X1+ 0.371 X2 + 0.318 X3+C.

References

Arep, Ishak dan Hendri Tanjung. 2003. Manajemen Motivasi. Penerbit PT. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, Jakarta.

Davis, Keith dan Newstrom. 1996. Human Behavior at Work Organizational Behavior. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

Dessler, Gary. 2000. Human Resource Management. New Jersey 07458, Prentice Hall Inc.

Hersey, Paul & Blanchard, Kenneth. (1995). Manajemen Perilaku Organisasi : Pendayagunaan Sumber Daya Manusia. Alih bahasa : Dhrama, Agus. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.

Hick, Herbert G., G. Ray Gullet. 1996. Organisasi : Teori Dan Tingkah Laku. Diterjemahkan oleh G. Kartasasmita dan A. G. Kartasapoetra. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Kerlinger, Fred N. 2002. Asas-asas Penelitian Behavioral. Penerjemah :

Landung R. Simatupang dan H.J. Koesoemanto. Penerbit Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2003. Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.

Nawawi, H. (2000). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia untuk Bisnis yang Kompetitif. Gajah Mada University Press,Yogyakarta

Santoso, Singgih. 2001. SPSS : Statistik Parametrik. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta

Simamora, Hendry. (1997). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. STIE YKPN, Jakarta.

Sugiyono. 2002. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung.

Tampubolon, Manahan P. 2004. Perilaku Keorganisasian Organization Behavior). Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta

Umar, Husein. 2002. Metode Riset Bisnis. Penerbit PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta

Downloads

Published

30-08-2018

How to Cite

., A., Djamil, M., & Rahim, A. (2018). Organizational Culture, Work Discipline, and Compensation on Organizational Commitment (Case study : the Department of Agriculture in the city of Bogor). Jurnal Manajemen, 8(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v8i1.734