PENGEMBANGAN ASESMEN DIAGNOSTIK KOGNITIF DIGITAL UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN BERDIFERENSIASI DI SMK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/educate.v11i2.24247Kata Kunci:
Asesmen Diagnotif Kognitif Digital, Pembelajaran yang disesuiakan, Slido, Sekolah Menengah KejuruanAbstrak
Transformasi digital dalam pendidikan menuntut penerapan asesmen yang mampu mengidentifikasi kebutuhan belajar peserta didik secara cepat dan akurat. Namun, pelaksanaan asesmen diagnostik di sekolah menengah kejuruan masih belum dimanfaatkan secara optimal sebagai dasar pengambilan keputusan pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengembangkan model asesmen diagnostik kognitif digital berbasis Slido pada pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan di SMK. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan Research and Development dengan modifikasi model Borg dan Gall yang dipadukan dengan tahapan ADDIE dan Four-D. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas peserta didik kelas X pada tiga tahap uji coba, yaitu uji terbatas, uji diperluas, dan uji operasional. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara, angket, dan instrumen asesmen diagnostik digital. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif melalui model interaktif dan secara kuantitatif menggunakan statistik deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model yang dikembangkan memenuhi kriteria valid, praktis, dan layak digunakan. Implementasi model memungkinkan identifikasi pengetahuan awal dan miskonsepsi peserta didik secara real time, meningkatkan keterlibatan belajar, serta mendukung pembelajaran berdiferensiasi. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa asesmen diagnostik kognitif digital berbasis Slido dapat menjadi inovasi pedagogis yang efektif dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran dan praktik asesmen di SMK.
Referensi
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York, NY: Springer.
Chiu, T. K. F., et al. (2024). Using generative artificial intelligence tools to explain and enhance experiential learning for authentic assessment. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111172
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Geiger, V., et al. (2021). Identifying pedagogical factors influencing the use of diagnostic assessment in secondary classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00392-5
Hughes, M., et al. (2024). On the use of an online polling platform for enhancing student engagement in an engineering module. Education Sciences, 14(5), 536. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050536
Kuzminska, O., et al. (2024). Digital competence of higher education applicants. Information Technologies and Learning Tools. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v101i3.5530
Luckin, R., et al. (2024). Challenges and opportunities for classroom-based formative assessment and artificial intelligence. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100213
Lüdtke, O., et al. (2024). Towards a framework to support the implementation of digital formative assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2344700
Mahmud, S., et al. (2025). Teachers’ reflections on utilizing Slido to enhance learner engagement. World Journal of English Language, 15(5), 242. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n5p242
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Muntean, C. H., et al. (2024). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090984
Niculescu, B., et al. (2024). Digital assessment: A survey of Romanian higher education teachers’ practices and needs. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020158
Pallitt, N., et al. (2023). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080756
Redecker, C., et al. (2024). A meta-synthesis study on the use of e-assessment tools in education. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030241
Rienties, B., et al. (2022). Formative assessment strategies for students’ conceptions: The potential of learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13195
Sugiyo, R. A., Effendi, Y. R., & Iswahyudi, D. (2025). The impact of AI ChatGPT on the challenges and opportunities for civics teachers in the Gen Z era. Jurnal PTI (Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi), 12(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.35134/jpti.v12i2.240
Schneider, S., et al. (2022). The cognitive-affective-social theory of learning in digital environments (CASTLE). Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1025–1059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09626-5
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Ilham Maulana, Yulius Rustan Effendi, Luluk Masruroh Zuhri
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis memberikan hak cipta karyanya kepada jurnal yang dilisensikan dengan CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License yang memungkinkan orang lain untuk menggunakan karya dengan pengakuan kepengarangan karya dan publikasi awal dalam jurnal ini.
