Penilaian Manajemen Risiko K3 menggunakan Metode Severity Index pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Laboratorium Terpadu II ITK

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v9i2.17007

Keywords:

Construction Risk, Integrated Laboratory of the Kalimantan Institute of Technology, Occupational Health and Safety, , Risk Management Analysis, Severity Index Method

Abstract

ITK II is an integrated laboratory building construction project currently does not involve identifying hazards, risk assessment, determining risk levels, or comprehensive risk control. The results of observations and interviews by the author show that dangers can arise due to workers' implementation, actions, and unsafe conditions. Based on these conditions, it is necessary to carry out a risk analysis with the aim of knowing what risks may occur, knowing the dominant risk level, and knowing the dominant risk response, as well as providing recommendations for effective risk control on the ITK II Integrated Laboratory Building Construction Project. The approach applied in this research includes a qualitative approach, namely at the survey, observation, interview, and distribution of questionnaire stages, and a quantitative approach is used to assess the probability and impact of risks, sort risks from highest to lowest, categorize risks, and design mitigation. risk.  The severity index method is used to calculate the probability and impact of an event. The calculation is carried out based on responses from respondents using a Likert scale and validated by experts. Then, an analysis of the risk response to the dominant risks is carried out. In the relevance test, the results obtained were 22 relevant variables and 3 irrelevant variables. Furthermore, during the validity test and reliability test, the results of the two tests obtained for each variable were valid and reliable. After that, the risk level was calculated, and 15 dominant sub-risks were obtained with a probability and impact matrix value of 9 in the "high" risk category. Risk responses that can be given are: placing safety signs in the work area, using PPE, increasing signs in each corner of the project, holding short meetings to discuss worker safety aspects regularly before starting work, wearing anti-slip shoes when working in a work environment where there is a risk of slipping, and carrying out regular field supervision.

References

Australian/New Zealand Standard 4360:2004, (2004), Risk Management Guidelines AS/NZS 4360:2004, 3rd edition, Sydney.

Faizal & Arif (2009). Estimating Contigency Cost in Construction by Contractors. Department of Civil Engineering, University Technology of Petronas, Malaysia.

Friyandary, B., Ihsan, T., & Lestari, R. A. (2020). Kajian Literatur Analisis Risiko Keselamatan Kerja dengan Metode Kualitatif pada Proyek Konstruksi di Indonesia: sebuah review. Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, 19(5), 331-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mkmi.19.5.331-344

Harahap, I. M., & Purwandito, M. (2022). Analisis Risiko Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3) Melalui Metode HIRADC dan Metode JSA pada Proyek Lanjutan Pembangunan Rumah Sakit Regional Langsa. Menara: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 17(2), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.21009/jmenara.v17i2.26853

Hartono, W., Sugiyarto, S., & Rahayu, P. S. (2019). Studi Manajemen Risiko Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja dengan Metode HIRAC (Studi Kasus: Pada Proyek Pembangunan Apartemen Tamansari Amarta Yogyakarta). Matriks Teknik Sipil, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/mateksi.v7i2.36508

Majid, M.Z.A. & Mc.Caffer, R. (1997). Assessment of Work Performance of Maintenance Contractors in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0742- 597x(1997)13:5(91)

Masri, D., Abidin, A, U., Brontiowiyonno, W. (2022), Hazard identification, risk assessment and determining control occupational health and safety (OHS) in CV C-Maxi Alloycast. Jurnal teknik lingkungan, 28(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.tl.2022.28.2.1

PMI (Project Manajemen Institute, Inc). (2004). A Guide to The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK), 3rd edition, Newton Square, Pennyslvania, USA.

Ramli, S. (2010). Sistem Manajemen Keselamatan & Kesehatan Kerja OHSAS 18001. Seri Manajemen K3 01(Husjain Djajaningrat. ed). Jakarta: PT. Dian Rakyat.

Sari, O. L., & Mangiwa, A. (2024). Perspektif Expert dalam Penentuan Komponen, Elemen dan Sub Elemen pada Pemeliharaan dan Perawatan Bangunan. Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 8(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v8i1.14685

Situmorang, R., Sari, O. L., & Saputra, A. A. I. (2022). Rencana Keselamatan Konstruksi (Studi Kasus Gedung Laboratorium Terpadu 2 Institut Teknologi Kalimantan). Compact: Spatial Development Journal, 1(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35718/compact.v1i2.772

Published

2025-08-05

How to Cite

Hanun, F., Situmorang, R., Fauzi, A., & Sari, O. L. (2025). Penilaian Manajemen Risiko K3 menggunakan Metode Severity Index pada Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Laboratorium Terpadu II ITK . Jurnal Komposit: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Teknik Sipil, 9(2), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.32832/komposit.v9i2.17007

Issue

Section

Articles