How Inclusive Leadership Fosters Innovative Work Behavior
The Serial Mediating Roles of Psychological Safety and Employee Resilience among Generation Z Employees
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v17i3.24925Keywords:
Inclusive leadership, Innovative work behavior, EmployeesAbstract
This study examines the effect of inclusive leadership presence in the workplace, specifically targeting Generation Z. This study examine inclusive leadership may affect psychological safety, resilience, and innovative work behavior. The literature used to develop the research model addressed the research problems; moreover, the literature on inclusive leadership, psychological safety, resilience, and innovative work behavior was used. The research approach applied in this study employs an explanatory quantitative design, and the researcher collected data via an online questionnaire from 210 active Generation Z employees in the Greater Jakarta area who had been working for at least 1 year. To analyze the data, the researcher conducted Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) using SmartPLS. Structural model evaluation indicates that inclusive leadership significantly enhances psychological safety, which then serves as a crucial underlying mechanism that strengthens employee resilience and innovative work behavior.
References
Dwidienawati, D., Pradipto, Y., & Gandasari, D. (2025). Internal and External Factors Influencing Gen Z Wellbeing. BMC Public Health, 25(1584), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22124-5.
WHO. (2026, 09 15). Retrieved September 2026, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-at-work
Surugiu, C., Surugiu, M.-R., Gradinaru, C., & Grigore, A.-M. (2025). Factors Motivating Generation Z in the Workplace: Managerial Challenges and Insights. Administrative Science, 15(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15010029.
Zhang, G., & Zhao, W. (2023). The Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employees Innovative Behavior - an Intermediary Model with Moderation. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 45(1), 64-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2023-0287 .
Roberson, Q. (2021). Inclusive Leadership in Thought and Action: A Thematic Analysis. Group and Organization Management, 47(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211013161.
Kuknor, S. C., & Bhattacharya, S. (2022). Inclusive Leadership: New Age Leadership to Foster Organizational Inclusion. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9), 771-797. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2019-0132.
Cascio, J. (2020, 4 30). Facing the Age of Chaos.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602.
Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654.
Yang, Z. (2025). Impact Mechanism of Inclusive Leadership on Employee's Workplace Wellbeing in Service Enterprises: a Chain Mediation Model of Relational Identification and Job Embeddedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1-15: DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1679002.
Edmonson, A., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23-43. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287.
Newman, A., Donohue, R., & Eva, N. (2017). Psychological Safety: A Systematic Review of Literature. Human Resource Management Review, 27(3), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001.
Dong, R. K., Li, X., & Hernan, B. R. (2024). Psychological Safety and Psychosocial Safety Climate in Workplace: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review Towards a Research Agenda. Journal of Safety Research, 91, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2024.08.001.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quaterly, 44(2), 350-383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999.
Li, T., & Tang, N. (2022). Inclusive Leadership and Innovative Performance: A Multi-Level Mediation Model of Psychological Safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934831.
Karademir, O., & Ozturk, A. (2025). The Role of Psychological Safety in the Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior. The Journal of Third Sector Economic Review, 60(4), 3624-3641. https://doi.org/10.63556/tisej.2025.1619.
Gong, L., Zhang, S., & Liu, Z. (2023). The Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Task Performance: a Moderated Mediation Model of Resilience Capacity and Work Meaningfulness. Baltic Journal of Management, 19(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-01-2023-0029.
Liu, Y., Fang, Y., & He, G. (2025). The Effect of Inclusive Leadership on Employee Wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 39991. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-23703-7.
Javed, B., Naqvi, S. M., Khan, A. K., Arjoon, S., & Tayyed, H. H. (2019). Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Innovative Work Behavior: The Role of Psychological Safety. Journal of Management and Organization, 25(1), 117-136. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.3.
Lisbet, Z. T., Arafah, W., & Aseanty, D. (2023). The Influence of Employee Wellbeing and Employee Resilience on Innovation Work Behavior Mediated By Work Climate in the Insurance Industry in DKI Jakarta. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(3), 865-878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.38142/ijesss.v4i3.414.
Damayanti, D. W., & Kurniawan, J. E. (2023). Innovative Work Behavior in Employed Homemakers: The Role of Work-family Balance and Resilience. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 10(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i2.1045.
Mohammad, S., Sagsan, M., & Sesen, H. (2024). The Impact of “Learning Organizations” on Innovation: The Mediating Role of “Employee Resilience” and Work Engagement. Sage Open, 14(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241289185.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modelling. Journal of Academy of Marketing, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Manajemen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
