The Effectiveness of Employee Performance of Ministry of Religious Affairs during Work from Home and The Factors that Influence It

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v13i1.5485

Keywords:

intrinsic motivation, technology infrstructure, performance, work environment, work from home

Abstract

Working from home as a new method of flexible work is being accelerated due to the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This new work system resulted in several changes that occurred in the workplace related to the work environment. Furthermore, changes occur in the use of higher technology. This indicates the importance of the availability of technology infrastructure while working from home. This study was conducted to analyze the effectiveness of employee performance while working from home. This study also aims to analyze the effect of work environment, technology infrastructure, work autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on employee performance. Data analysis was performed using Wilcoxon Signed Rank and Structural Equation Modeling Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS). The results show that employee performance is less effective when working from home. This is indicated by a decrease in employee performance. Work environment, technology infrastructure and intrinsic motivation have a significant effect on employee performance while working from home. Meanwhile, no significant effect was found between work autonomy and employee performance.

Author Biographies

Siti Rosidah, IPB University

Management Science, Magister Student

M. Syamsul Maarif, IPB University

Department of Management

Anggraini Sukmawati, IPB University

Department of Management

References

Ahmetoglu G, Scarlett L, Codreanu SC, & Premuzic TC. (2019). The impact of organizational structure and work autonomy in fostering entrepreneurial tendencies and job performance. Journal of Evidence-based HRM, 8(1), 128-143. doi: 10.1108/EBHRM-11-2018-0070.

Al-Omari, Kall & Okasheh, H. (2017). The Influence of Work Environment on Job Per-for-mance: A Case Study of Engineering Company in Jordan. International Journal of Ap-plied Engineering Research. 12 (24), 15544-15550.

Armstrong M. 2018. Performance Management: An Evidence–Based Guide to Delivering High Performance. New Yor: Kogan Page.

Awanis, N.A & Khatijah (2017). Looking into Working

Environment, Integrity and Religiosity as Enhancement for Employee's Job Performance in Malaysia. Journal engineering and applied science, 12(6), 1551-1557.

Cetin F, Askun D. (2018). The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsic work motivation. Management Research Review, 41(2), 186–201. doi:10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0062.

Colquitt JA, Lepine JA, & Wesson MJ. (2014). Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Diamantidis A, & Chatzoglou P. (2018). Factors affecting employee performance: an em-pirical approach. Journal of IJPPM, 1741-0401, doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2018-0012.

Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A., (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about tele-commuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541.

Gajendran RS, Harrison DA, & Klinger KD, (2014). Are Telecommuters Remotely Good Citizens? Unpacking Telecommuting's Effects On Performance Via I-Deals And Job Re-sources. Jounal of Personnel Psychology, 68(2), 1-41. doi:10.1111/peps.12082

Gibson J, Ivancevich J, & Konopaske R, (2011). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Pro-cesses. Ed-14. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hair JF, Hult GT, Ringle CM, & Sarstedt M, (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). London: Sage Publications.

[ILO] International Labour Organization. (2017). Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work. Joint ILO–Eurofound report. 1–72. doi:10.2806/425484.

Jabbouri NI, Siron R, Zahari I, Khalid M. 2015. Impact of Information Technology Infra-structure on Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study on private Universities In Iraq. Procedia Economics and Finance. 39:861–869. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30250-7.

Johari J, & Yahya KK, (2016). Job characteristics, work involvement, and job perfor-mance of public servants. Journal of EJTD, 40(7), 554–575. doi:10.1108/ejtd-07-2015-0051.

Klindzic M, Maric M, (2019). Flexible Work Arrangements and Organizational Perfor-mance – The Difference between Employee and Employer-Driven Practices. Journal of Drustvena Istrazivanj, 28(1), 89–108. doi:10.5559/di.28.1.05.

Mardanov I, (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, organizational context, employee contentment, job satisfaction, performance and intention to stay. Journal of Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. 2049-3983. doi:10.1108/EBHRM-02-2020-0018.

Marsal ZN, Subriadi AP, & Sholi, (2012). Analysis of the Effect of Human Resources and Information Technology Infrastructure on Company Performance Case Study: Pt. XYZ. Journal of Pomits Technique. 1–8. [accessed 17 Feb 2021]. http://digilib.its.ac.id/ITS-paper-52121140006533/34572.

Mustafa M, Ramos HM, & Badri SKZ. (2020). Determining nonfamily employees' job sat-isfaction and turnover intentions: the roles of job autonomy and work passion. Journal of Family Business Manangement, 2043-6238. doi:10.1108/JFBM-08-2020-0079.

Nakrosiene A, Buciuniene I, & Gostautaite B. (2019). Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87-101. doi:10.1108/IJM-07-2017-0172.

Nesheim T, Olsen KM, & Sandvik AM, (2017). Never walk alone: achieving work per-formance through networking ability and autonomy. Journal of Employee Relations, 39(2), 240–253. doi:10.1108/ER-09-2016-0185.

Nitisemito AS, (2011). Manajemen Personalia (Manajemen Sumberdaya Manusia). Ed-5. Jakarta (ID): Ghalia Indonesia.

Ratna K, & Kaur T (2016). The impact of Information Technology on Job Related Factors like Health and Safety, Job Satisfaction, Performance, Productivity and Work Life Bal-ance. Journal of Business Finance & Accointing, 5(1), 1-9. doi:10.4172/2167-0234.1000171.

Rupietta K, & Beckmann M. (2016). Working from Home, what is the effect on employ-ees effort?. WWZ Working paper, 1-40. doi:10.1007/s41464-017-0043-x.

Santosa, P.I., (2018). Quantitative ResearchMethod. Yogyakarta: Penerbit ANDI (Ang-gota IKAPI).

Saragih, S., (2011). The Effects of Job Autonomy on Work Outcomes: Self Efficacy as an Intervening Variable. Journal of Business Studies, 4 (3), 203 – 215.

Theurer CP, Tumasjan A, & Welpe IM. (2018). Contextual work design and employee in-novative work behavior: When does autonomy matter?. Journal of PLOS ONE, 13(10):1-35. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204089.

Vilhelmson, B., Thulin, E., (2016). Who and where are the flexible workers? Exploring the current diffusion of telework in Sweden. Journal New Technology, Work and Employ-ment, 31(1), 77-96.

[WHO] World Health Organization, (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic re-sponse on other health research. [internet]. [accessed 10 July2009].

Wibowo. 2017. Manajemen Kinerja. Ed 5th. Depok (ID): PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Zhang J. (2016). The dark side of virtual office and job satisfaction. International Journal of Business Management, 11(2), 40-46. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v11n2p40.

Zhou Q, Li Q, & Gong S. (2019). How Job Autonomy Promotes Employee's Sustainable Development? A Moderated Mediation Model. Journal of Sustainability, 11(22), 1-14. doi:10.3390/su11226445.

Downloads

Published

01-02-2022

How to Cite

Rosidah, S., Maarif, M. S., & Sukmawati, A. (2022). The Effectiveness of Employee Performance of Ministry of Religious Affairs during Work from Home and The Factors that Influence It. Jurnal Manajemen, 13(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v13i1.5485