Model Evaluasi Kinerja Tanggung Jawab Sosial Lingkungan Perusahaan di Kota Bogor

Authors

  • Arif Wicaksono Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Bogor
  • Syarifah Sofiah Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor
  • Rudy Mashudi Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Bogor
  • Lusi N Badri Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Bogor
  • Ratu D Safitri Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Bogor
  • Oni Hidayati Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Bogor
  • Irma Arlini Dewi Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kota Bogor
  • Budi Susetyo Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v13i1.5969

Keywords:

Proposal TJSLP/CSR, analisis kelayakan proposal, PROMETHEE

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is a critical partnership potential in regional development. This potential is currently not too significant in its role and contribution to growth in Bogor, considering that the number is still limited. The TJSLP Secretariat encourages the participation of all parties through the preparation of a mechanism for submitting community TJSLP  to the company. The purpose of this research is to develop a model for evaluating CSRs performance, which can be used as a basis for making decisions for the recommendations of the Bogor City government to corporate partners who have CSR programs. The evaluation model uses the PROMETHEE (Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation) method to see the feasibility of the proposal with several criteria, namely the suitability of the program with the RPJMD (K1), activity category (K2), and activity costs (K3). The research resulted in a weighted value of K1=0.50, K2=0.33, K3=0.17. That look the ranking of the most appropriate in terms of the policy is Proposal B (religious), G (health), C (spiritual), H (health), A ( health), K (sports), J (education), D (economy), E (economy), I (environment), F (background). The results of sensitivity analysis, Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient of 0.97, between the results of the PROMETHEE ranking before and after the change in the weight of the criteria indicate high consistency, which is far from subjectivity. This TJSLP performance evaluation model is helpful for the TJSLP secretariat to evaluate the implementation of the CSR program in Bogor City.

References

Dewi, N. L. P. I. T., Kurniawan, P. S., & Sujana, E. (2018). Analisis Proses Penganggaran Dan Pengelolaan Dana Csr Serta Dampaknya Terhadap Peningkatan Citra Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Pt.Pln (Persero) Distribusi Bali Area Bali Utara, Di Singaraja Buleleng). JIMAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi), 9(2), 149-163.

Kabassi, K.& Martinis, A. (2021). Sensitivity Analysis of PROMETHEE II for the Evaluation of Environmental Websites. Applied Sciences, 11, 9215. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199215

Lantu, D. C., Pulungan, S.A., & Yudiarti, D. (2017). Analyzing The Effectiveness Of A Joint Corporate Social Responsibility Program To Empower People In An Indonesian Village. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(2), 323-338.

Lesmana, D., & Wibowo, B. R. (2021) Analisis Pemanfaatan Dana Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Dalam Pembangunan Di Kabupaten Kutai Timur (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Teluk Pandan Dan Bengalon). Jurnal Riset Pembangunan, 3(2), 78-87.

Malczewski, J. & Rinner. C. (2015). Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Geographic Information Science. Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Malczewski, J. (2006). Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8(4), 270-277 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.01.003

Nikoloudis, C., Stranzali, E. & Aravossis, K. (2017). Applying the multi-criteria method Promethee II for the startup ranking during a business ideas competition. 6th International Symposium & 28th National Conference on Operational Research "OR in the digital era – ICT challenges” Thessaloniki, Greece, 08 – 10/06/2017.

Nurhayati, T., Rosilawati, Y., & Ishak, A. (2020). Community Development "Istana Kelulut” Masyarakat Pasca Tambang Sebagai Aktualisasi Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) PT Adaro Indonesia. Jurnal Audience: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. 3(2), 147-169.

Saaty, T.L. (1977) A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

Stojanović, A. , Mihajlović I., Safronova, N. B., Kunev, S. & Schulte, P. (2021). The multi-criteria analysis of corporate social responsibility: a comparative study of Russia, Bulgaria and Serbia. Journal of Management & Organization, 27, 809–829. doi:10.1017/jmo.2020.40

Tuljak-Suban, D., & Bajec, P. (2020). Integration of AHP and GTMA to Make a Reliable Decision in Complex Decision-Making Problems: Application of the Logistics Provider Selection Problem as a Case Study. Symmetry, 12(5), 766.

Downloads

Published

01-02-2022

How to Cite

Wicaksono, A., Sofiah, S., Mashudi, R., Badri, L. N., Safitri, R. D., Hidayati, O., Dewi, I. A., & Susetyo, B. (2022). Model Evaluasi Kinerja Tanggung Jawab Sosial Lingkungan Perusahaan di Kota Bogor. Jurnal Manajemen, 13(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.32832/jm-uika.v13i1.5969

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Manajemen (Edisi Elektronik)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).