Hubungan pendekatan pembelajaran mendalam dan pembinaan guru terhadap pemahaman konsep siswa pada mata pelajaran pendidikan agama Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/itjmie.v7i3.23439Keywords:
Keterlibatan Kognitif, Pembelajaran Mendalam, Pembinaan Guru, Pemahaman Konsep, Pendidikan Agama IslamAbstract
This study examines the relationship between deep learning approaches and teacher mentoring and students’ conceptual understanding in Islamic Religious Education. A quantitative approach with a correlational design was employed, involving 79 eighth-grade students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability, and were subsequently analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. The findings indicate that the deep learning approach demonstrates a stronger relationship with students’ conceptual understanding (ρ = 0.561; p < 0.05) compared to teacher mentoring (ρ = 0.426; p < 0.05). Simultaneously, both variables contribute to conceptual understanding, although the magnitude of their contribution is relatively modest. These results underscore that active student engagement through deep learning approaches constitutes a primary factor in fostering meaningful conceptual understanding, while teacher mentoring functions as a supporting element in the learning process. Therefore, integrating instructional strategies that emphasize students’ cognitive engagement with effective teacher roles is essential to enhance the quality of learning.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini menganalisis hubungan antara pendekatan pembelajaran mendalam dan pembinaan guru dengan pemahaman konsep siswa dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain korelasional terhadap 79 siswa kelas VIII yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan angket skala Likert yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitasnya, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan korelasi Spearman Rank. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan pembelajaran mendalam memiliki hubungan yang lebih kuat dengan pemahaman konsep siswa (ρ = 0,561; p < 0,05) dibandingkan pembinaan guru (ρ = 0,426; p < 0,05). Secara simultan, kedua variabel memberikan kontribusi terhadap pemahaman konsep, meskipun kontribusinya relatif kecil. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa keterlibatan aktif siswa melalui pendekatan pembelajaran mendalam menjadi faktor utama dalam membangun pemahaman konseptual yang bermakna, sedangkan pembinaan guru berperan sebagai faktor pendukung dalam proses pembelajaran. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan integrasi strategi pembelajaran yang berorientasi pada aktivitas kognitif siswa dengan peran guru yang efektif untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran.
References
Budhiarti, Y., Mytra, P., & Slow, L. (2025). The Role of Deep learning in Elementary Education: Pedagogical Insights from a Literature Study. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Inovasi Pendidikan. https://jurnal-pip.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/14
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive Sampling: Complex or Simple? Research Case Examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (n.d.). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Fitrah, M., Sofroniou, A., Yarmanetti, N., & Ismail, I. H. (2025). Are Teachers Ready to Adopt Deep learning Pedagogy? Education Sciences, 15(10). https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/10/1344
Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2021). Deep learning: Engage the World, Change the World. Corwin Press.
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible Learning: The Sequel.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2021). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403.
Kovač, V. B., Nome, D. Ø., Jensen, A. R., & Skreland, L. L. (2023). The why, what and how of deep learning. Education Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2194502
Kovač, V. B., Nome, D. Ø., Jensen, A. R., & Skreland, L. L. (2025). The Why, What and How of Deep learning. Education Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2194502
Meliyawati, M., & Dinata, F. R. (2025). The Role of Classroom Teachers in Integrating Deep learning into Curriculum. Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Education. https://journal.kurasinstitute.com/index.php/biis/article/view/166 7
Mishra, P., Pandey, C. M., Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C., & Keshri, A. (2019). Descriptive Statistics and Normality Tests for Statistical Data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_157_18
Nuraini, L., Wibowo, A., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Problematika evaluasi afektif dalam pembelajaran PAI di sekolah menengah. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 21(2), 189–205.
Setiyowati, E., & Puspita, A. M. I. (2025). Teachers’ Pedagogical Competence in Designing Deep learning and HOTS Assessment. Journal of Innovation in Primary Education. https://ejournal.papanda.org/index.php/jirpe/article/view/2633
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Globalisation and Education Reforms. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Zhao, L., Wu, G., Shao, W., & Ma, X. (2024). Conceptual understanding and cognitive patterns construction. Scientific Reports, 14, 83028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83028-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wili Widiansesi, Supriadi, Hidayani Syam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
