Implementasi model CIPP dalam evaluasi program pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam: Kajian literatur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/itjmie.v7i8.24347Kata Kunci:
Educational evaluation; CIPP model; Islamic Religious EducationAbstrak
This study aims to analyze the implementation of the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) evaluation model in Islamic Religious Education learning and to identify its strengths, weaknesses, and implications for improving instructional quality. This research employs a qualitative approach using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) based on the PRISMA framework. Data were collected from relevant national and international scientific articles and analyzed using content analysis to identify patterns within each CIPP component. The findings reveal that, in the context dimension, Islamic Religious Education has not been fully based on students’ contextual needs, making it less responsive to digital era challenges. In the input dimension, limitations were found in teachers’ competencies, digital technology skills, and curriculum alignment with learners’ needs. In the process dimension, instruction remains predominantly conventional, indicating that student-centered learning is not yet optimally implemented. In the product dimension, learning outcomes are still mainly assessed cognitively, while affective and spiritual aspects are not comprehensively measured. Overall, the CIPP model is proven to be a comprehensive evaluation framework; however, its implementation in Islamic Religious Education still requires strengthening across all components to ensure greater relevance and meaningful learning outcomes.
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi model evaluasi Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) dalam pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) serta mengidentifikasi kekuatan, kelemahan, dan implikasinya terhadap peningkatan mutu pembelajaran. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode Systematic Literature Review (SLR) berdasarkan pedoman PRISMA. Data diperoleh dari artikel ilmiah nasional dan internasional yang relevan, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan teknik analisis isi untuk mengidentifikasi pola pada setiap komponen CIPP. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada aspek konteks, pembelajaran PAI belum sepenuhnya berbasis analisis kebutuhan kontekstual peserta didik sehingga kurang adaptif terhadap tantangan era digital. Pada aspek input, ditemukan keterbatasan kompetensi guru, kesenjangan penguasaan teknologi, serta ketidaksesuaian sebagian kurikulum dengan kebutuhan peserta didik. Pada aspek proses, pembelajaran masih didominasi pendekatan konvensional sehingga implementasi pembelajaran aktif belum optimal. Pada aspek produk, evaluasi hasil masih berfokus pada aspek kognitif, sedangkan aspek afektif dan spiritual belum terukur secara komprehensif. Secara keseluruhan, model CIPP terbukti efektif sebagai pendekatan evaluasi yang komprehensif, namun implementasinya dalam pembelajaran PAI masih memerlukan penguatan pada seluruh komponen agar lebih relevan dan bermakna.
Referensi
Al-Shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of self-learning curriculum using CIPP model for early childhood education. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 4(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.24252/jier.v4i1.1245
Aristya, S., Zurqoni, & Sugeng. (2023). Implementasi model evaluasi CIPP dalam pendidikan: Tinjauan literatur. Jurnal Evaluasi dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.35334/jep.v5i2.2072
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Riset pendidikan: Perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan evaluasi riset kualitatif & kuantitatif. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Pustaka Belajar.
Damayanti, E., Ibrahim, M. M., & Ismail, M. I. (2021). Evaluation of online learning programs at universities using the CIPP model. Jurnal Educative: Journal of Education Studies, 6(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.31537/educative.v6i1.342
Indra, H. (2019). Revitalisasi pendidikan keagamaan Islam era digital 4.0. Tawazun: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(2), 278–288. doi.org/10.32832/tawazun.v12i2.2408
Jasrio, A., Ambiyar, Rizal, F., Safitri, E., Rozimela, Y., & Nofrion. (2026). Implementation of CIPP model in social studies learning: A literature review. International Journal of Geography, Social, and Multicultural Education, 4(1), 56–77. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijgsme.v4i1.4532
Kurniawati, E. W. (2021). Evaluasi program pendidikan berbasis model CIPP pada satuan pendidikan dasar. GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.5281/ghaitsa.v2i1.89
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Qak, A. S., & Shofiana, I. (2026). Evaluasi sistem pembelajaran PAI menggunakan model CIPP untuk meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di tingkat dasar. The Elementary Journal, 4(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.21831/tej.v4i1.5129
Rahmat, Z., & Ambiyar. (2025). The CIPP evaluation model in school programs: A systematic literature review. JKIP: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(4), 911–919. http://journal.al-matani.com/index.php/jkip/article/view/789
Santosa, T. A., Ilwandri, Sofianora, A., & Yastanti, U. (2023). Efektivitas model CIPP dalam evaluasi pembelajaran IPA di Indonesia: Meta-analisis. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 5(2), 2423–2430. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpk.v5i2.4125
Shah, A., Siregar, S., Aldair, M. D., & Halimah, S. (2025). Evaluasi Kurikulum Merdeka pelajaran PAI melalui model CIPP. Jurnal Mudabbir: Journal Research and Education Studies, 5(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.5678/mudabbir.v5i1.112
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, & applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sugandini. (2018). Evaluasi program kompetensi keahlian menggunakan model CIPP. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan, 15(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk.v15i1.156
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta.
Zhang, G. (2011). CIPP evaluation framework for educational program assessment. Journal of Educational Research, 104(4), 245–256.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Siti Jubaedah Ghani, Mahawi, Ika Rostika, Akhmad Fauzi, Karman

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



