Rekonstruksi pendidikan agama Islam dalam menghadapi krisis moral generasi muda di era disrupsi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32832/itjmie.v7i9.24521Kata Kunci:
Islamic Religious Education, Reconstruction, Generational Moral Crisis, and the Disruption Era.Abstrak
The era of disruption has fundamentally changed the mechanisms of knowledge formation, values, and behavior of the younger generation thru the dominance of digital technology, social media, and Artificial Intelligence. These changes have given rise to a moral crisis characterized by a weakening of ethical awareness, an increase in moral relativism, and a shift in the authority of values from educational institutions to the digital space. This research aims to reconstruct the paradigm of Islamic Religious Education to be more adaptive in facing the dynamics of the digital society. The study was conducted thru a critical synthesis of various recent research and theories to identify development patterns, conceptual gaps, and the direction of the transformation of Islamic Religious Education. The research results indicate that the paradigm of Islamic Religious Education, which is still oriented toward the transmission of knowledge, is unable to address the complexities of moral challenges in the era of Artificial Intelligence. This research offers a model for reconstructing Islamic Religious Education that integrates Islamic epistemology, digital ethics, Artificial Intelligence literacy, transformative learning, and the principles of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah as the foundation for character formation. The model provides a theoretical contribution to the development of the paradigm of Islamic Religious Education while also serving as a conceptual foundation for curriculum innovation and educational policies that are responsive to the changes in the digital society.
Abstrak
Era disrupsi telah mengubah secara fundamental mekanisme pembentukan pengetahuan, nilai, dan perilaku generasi muda melalui dominasi teknologi digital, media sosial, dan kecerdasan buatan. Perubahan tersebut memunculkan krisis moral yang ditandai oleh melemahnya kesadaran etis, meningkatnya relativisme moral, serta bergesernya otoritas nilai dari institusi pendidikan menuju ruang digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi paradigma Pendidikan Agama Islam agar lebih adaptif dalam menghadapi dinamika masyarakat digital. Kajian dilakukan melalui sintesis kritis terhadap berbagai penelitian dan teori mutakhir untuk mengidentifikasi pola perkembangan, kesenjangan konseptual, serta arah transformasi Pendidikan Agama Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa paradigma Pendidikan Agama Islam yang masih berorientasi pada transmisi pengetahuan belum mampu menjawab kompleksitas tantangan moral di era kecerdasan buatan. Penelitian ini menawarkan model rekonstruksi Pendidikan Agama Islam yang mengintegrasikan epistemologi Islam, etika digital, literasi kecerdasan buatan, pembelajaran transformatif, dan prinsip-prinsip maqāṣid al-syarī'ah sebagai fondasi pembentukan karakter. Model tersebut memberikan kontribusi teoretis bagi pengembangan paradigma Pendidikan Agama Islam sekaligus menjadi landasan konseptual bagi inovasi kurikulum dan kebijakan pendidikan yang responsif terhadap perubahan masyarakat digital.
Referensi
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Bond, M., Khosravi, H., Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., & Bond, C. (2024). A meta-systematic review of Artificial Intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z
Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and reflections from the educational landscape: A review of AI studies in half a century. Sustainability, 13(2), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800
Casal-Otero, L., Català, A., Fernández-Morante, C., Taboada, M., Cebreiro, B., & Barro, S. (2023). AI literacy in K–12: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
Chiu, T. K. F., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of Artificial Intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, Article 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book246896
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Dwivedi, Y. K., Timotheou, S., Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kasneci, E., Floridi, L., . . . Page, M. J. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. BMJ, 71(6), 102642. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Estaji, M., & Kogani, M. (2024). Assessment polarity or praxis parity? Uncovering the learning-oriented assessment (LOA) landscape of novice and experienced Iranian EFL teachers. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00310-3
Floridi, L. (2024). Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(6), 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y
Hakim, R., Ritonga, M., & dkk. (2023). Penguatan karakter religius melalui Pendidikan Agama Islam pada era Society 5.0. [Nama jurnal, volume, nomor, halaman, dan DOI belum tersedia].
Halstead, J. M. (2024). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510
Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2024). Visible learning: Feedback. London, England: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Visible-Learning-Feedback/Hattie-Clarke/p/book/9781138599895
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Boston, MA: Center for Curriculum Redesign. Retrieved from https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/AI-in-Education.pdf
Kasneci, E. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kesuma, M. I. J., Fatoni, I., Ajir, I. C., Yazdi, M. I. K., Pahrudin, A., Murtadho, A., & Rinaldi, A. (2025). Transformasi pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam berbasis teknologi digital di era Society 5.0. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i02.24428
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2018). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 108–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-sage-handbook-of-qualitative-research/book242504
Luckin, R., & Cukurova, M. (2019). Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences-driven approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 2824–2838. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12861
Megawati, M., Rahman, S., & Razak, A. (2024). Implementasi fungsi kepolisian selaku penyidik tindak pidana korupsi. Journal of Lex Philosophy. Retrieved from http://pasca-umi.ac.id/index.php/jlp/article/view/1819
Mezirow, J. (2024). Transformative learning theory. In J. Mezirow & E. W. Taylor (Eds.), Transformative learning in practice: Insights from community, workplace, and higher education (pp. 18–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Transformative+Learning+in+Practice%3A+Insights+from+Community%2C+Workplace%2C+and+Higher+Education-p-9780470590720
Mustafa, M. Y., Tlili, A., & Lampropoulos, G. (2024). A systematic review of literature reviews on Artificial Intelligence in education (AIED): A roadmap to a future research agenda. Smart Learning Environments, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00350-5
Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), Article 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
Ritonga, M., Sobhan, S., Bambang, B., Ritonga, M., & dkk. (2023). Utilizing technology to improve the quality of learning in Indonesia: Challenges and consequences for Arabic teachers. Arabiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 9(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v9i1.24516
Sihombing, A. A., Putranti, H. R. D., Noviani, N. L., & Atasoge, A. D. W. (2024). Technology-based education transformation: Futuristic, quality, resilient, and sustainable education system in the age of Society 5.0. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(3), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i3.70080
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Timotheou, S. (2023). Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8
Watson, M. (2024). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris, France: UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Sinta Silvia Supendi, Wasehudin, Fitri Hilmiyati
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
